Originally posted by tjfla
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2018/2019 Offseason Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
You mean former marlins legend Colin Rea? How does the order work for rule 5? Same as mlb draft where it goes in inverse order?
- - - - - - - - - -
Im surprised we (or any other team in need of some power) didnt take a flier on the guy the padres sold to japan. He's been pretty good the last few years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fish16 View PostYou mean former marlins legend Colin Rea? How does the order work for rule 5? Same as mlb draft where it goes in inverse order?
As for DFA
Miami has #1 Spot for NL teams
Means that any NL team like SD or Colorado(Patterson) we get 1st shot. If we want an AL teams guy we have to wait till all the AL teams get a shot then we get 1st choice out of NL teams
Problem is all a team has to do is make a trade and they can get guy over us.
It how SD got Brad Hand. We DFA him and SD had #1 choice in NL and got him
Comment
-
Gonna be a busy December for us
Rule 5 Options
Pitchers-Diaz,Raudes(Probably others)
SS-Arauz,Gomez,Brito(All 20/21 but higher ceiling than Rivera-all could be UT type in 2019)
1B-Ockimey/Gatewood
- - - - - - - - - -
Originally posted by fish16 View PostGood to know on the claiming guys priority as i didnt know that. Hopefully we just keep churning through players and see what sticks. Take chances on talent like we did with Obrien and others.
- - - - - - - - - -
NEVERMIND on Kaprelian. Oakland just added himLast edited by tjfla; 11-20-2018, 07:50 PM.
Comment
-
who is this arauz guy youre talking about? all i see for him is a RP in the phillies organization. Kaprelian makes a ton of sense for many reasons though. Id love to see what we can do with him. But ya that makes they added him. I didnt understand him not being added.
- - - - - - - - - -
Cj cron just designated for assignment. Another low cost 1b option for us potentially
Comment
-
Dietrich DFA'd.
Schales traded to Minnesota for AAA reliever Nick Anderson.
They must have thought Schales was going to be taken in the Rule 5 draft and decided to get something for him.
With Dietrich gone, the Marlins will certainly have to add someone that can provide power.Last edited by fauowls44; 11-20-2018, 09:16 PM.
Comment
-
Am I the only one that doesn't understand DFA'ing Dietrich? I mean he's going to make what? $4.2M? Come on......it's not as if he's a black hole out there - he's one of the few somewhat productive guys we have. There are several other guys you can dump who do nothing.
Comment
-
wow we fucking DFA'd Dietrich? Youve gotta think the free agent market for non-stars will be cheap as hell this year.
- - - - - - - - - -
i guess one of the downfalls of building the depth back in the upper levels of the minors is having to part with guys in a 40 man roster crunch. Nick anderson is another really fucking interesting addition for Schales though. Id assume they knew he was gonna be picked and just got what they could for him. Nick anderson has great K numbers and control it seems so another good bullpen addition for a guy in schales who most of us hadnt heard of prior to this year. Seems like another Eveld type addition similar to how we got Barraclough. Pretty much good at everything except for clutch free throws. I think these kinds of guys are really easy to pick up and a lot more valuable than they are made out to be.
- - - - - - - - - -
Again, like the previous 40 man moves, it seems like we are churning through a lot of the old regime players like crazy. It seems like this front office, right or wrong, values defensive ability and versatility and dietrich just was not good defensively. Still surprising he couldnt at least get a bullpen arm from an AL team, but it seems again like we will be able to get a lot of cheap value at the end of free agency if we want to take some fliers to potentially flip at the deadline. Especially 1b and Corner OF types.
The trade deadline was such a missed opportunity this past year. Barraclough, Steck, Conley, Dietrich. Idk if the market actually wasnt there because as another team i would have thought all those guys were major regression candidates, but it seems like we missed at least a few big opportunities to get some better prospects. the barraclough situation ultimately was ok because we were able to get IFA money for Victor Victor, but still some missed opportunities.
- - - - - - - - - -
We need to really take some shots on lineup pieces though. McCutchen and Murphy on 1 year deals or 2 year deals with team option for the second year would be the perfect additions to give us veteran presences in the lineup, give us pieces to potentially flip at the deadline, and gives us guys to take up spots so we dont have to rush guys like Harrison or Diaz next year.
- - - - - - - - - -
Originally posted by rmc523 View PostAm I the only one that doesn't understand DFA'ing Dietrich? I mean he's going to make what? $4.2M? Come on......it's not as if he's a black hole out there - he's one of the few somewhat productive guys we have. There are several other guys you can dump who do nothing.
- - - - - - - - - -
Am i the only one who doesnt get why nick anderson is available for a guy like Schales? Its not like Schales doesnt need to immediately be put on their 40 man too and that trading Anderson clears a potential 40 man spot for their 40 man roster crunch. I also dont believe they have a good bullpen so i dont get that deal from the Twins perspective but good for us. If we simply got good value for a guy like schales then Denbo did a great job because he was a nothing prospect last year and getting a potential reliever for a few years is a great get. I really cant stress enough how good it is to get these prospects who are reliever only therefore lowering their value but they are still really quality relievers for a few years. Barraclough is one example, Eveld is soon to be another, hopefully anderson can be another. They really seem to be an undervalued type of player.
I also wonder how much of getting those types of relievers is a concerted effort to build a quality long term bullpen to balance with the fact that as of now we have a lot of SP depth but no real top SP prospect (unless you consider Alcantara to be that). We have quietly built a shit ton of long term bullpen depth between Steck, Conley, Wittgren, Eveld, Guzman, Alcantara if he doesnt stick in the rotation, Jarlin, Lee, Quijada, and then the other SP flameout guys who might be better suited to the bullpen like Merandy and others similarly situated. Might not be on purpose but it does at the very least allow us to maybe build a good all around pitching staff with a deep bullpen even if we have a cluster fuck of mid rotation potential guys prior to seeing who we get for JT.
- - - - - - - - - -
Question for lou- once we inevitably deal JT and either trade of DFA straily, how low is our payroll currently? Our only contracts would be Chen and Prado and the only guys even available for arbitration are Rojas, Conley, and Urena. That would be 35 million for Chen and Prado, maybe like another 7 million combined for the other 3 because Urena and Conley will be in their first year of arbitration, and then everyone else as of now on minimum team control deals. That would be 42 million + the remaining 20 roster spots at whatever the minimum team control salary is (i believe around 500k). That would be a payroll as of now of 52 million. I really hope they spend the money and sign some roster fillers to flip some more at the deadline and continue this organizational purge until we find a consistent winner.Last edited by fish16; 11-20-2018, 10:16 PM.
Comment
-
It's called being cheap AF.
- - - - - - - - - -
Originally posted by fish16 View PostAm i the only one who doesnt get why nick anderson is available for a guy like Schales? Its not like Schales doesnt need to immediately be put on their 40 man too and that trading Anderson clears a potential 40 man spot for their 40 man roster crunch. I also dont believe they have a good bullpen so i dont get that deal from the Twins perspective but good for us. If we simply got good value for a guy like schales then Denbo did a great job because he was a nothing prospect last year and getting a potential reliever for a few years is a great get. I really cant stress enough how good it is to get these prospects who are reliever only therefore lowering their value but they are still really quality relievers for a few years. Barraclough is one example, Eveld is soon to be another, hopefully anderson can be another. They really seem to be an undervalued type of player.Last edited by Nick; 11-20-2018, 10:37 PM.
Comment
-
I question getting rid of Peters and not protecting Mills for an organization that has lower lefties right now.
However, if the idea is shifting Caleb Smith over, keeping Conley, and using Garcia, with Quijada the top backup in AAA, that makes some sense.
Holloway? What?
Hey they didn't protect Twine though!
- - - - - - - - - -
Originally posted by fish16 View PostI also wonder how much of getting those types of relievers is a concerted effort to build a quality long term bullpen to balance with the fact that as of now we have a lot of SP depth but no real top SP prospect (unless you consider Alcantara to be that). We have quietly built a shit ton of long term bullpen depth between Steck, Conley, Wittgren, Eveld, Guzman, Alcantara if he doesnt stick in the rotation, Jarlin, Lee, Quijada, and then the other SP flameout guys who might be better suited to the bullpen like Merandy and others similarly situated. Might not be on purpose but it does at the very least allow us to maybe build a good all around pitching staff with a deep bullpen even if we have a cluster fuck of mid rotation potential guys prior to seeing who we get for JT.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ¿NICK? View PostIt's called being cheap AF.
- - - - - - - - - -
Could it be that Anderson is 28-year old reliever that has yet to make the big leagues? Who are you, Lee Stone?
As far as Anderson, yes i sound like Lee Stone and i need to look into more of what his stuff is, but this doesnt seem like a guy who is getting by solely on experience relative to competition. His peripherals last year were legitimately impressive.He was slow to reach and progress through the professional ranks but has impressed upon reaching the upper minors. Last year, working at Triple-A, he turned in sixty frames of 3.30 ERA ball with 13.2 K/9 and 2.9 BB/9.
- - - - - - - - - -
Originally posted by lou View PostI question getting rid of Peters and not protecting Mills for an organization that has lower lefties right now.
However, if the idea is shifting Caleb Smith over, keeping Conley, and using Garcia, with Quijada the top backup in AAA, that makes some sense.
Holloway? What?
Hey they didn't protect Twine though!
- - - - - - - - - -
Thees guys built the yankees, of course they are doing that. The Yankees have had the best bullpen in the league, cumulatively, the last three years
Comment
-
Originally posted by fish16 View PostQuestion for lou- once we inevitably deal JT and either trade of DFA straily, how low is our payroll currently? Our only contracts would be Chen and Prado and the only guys even available for arbitration are Rojas, Conley, and Urena. That would be 35 million for Chen and Prado, maybe like another 7 million combined for the other 3 because Urena and Conley will be in their first year of arbitration, and then everyone else as of now on minimum team control deals. That would be 42 million + the remaining 20 roster spots at whatever the minimum team control salary is (i believe around 500k). That would be a payroll as of now of 52 million. I really hope they spend the money and sign some roster fillers to flip some more at the deadline and continue this organizational purge until we find a consistent winner.
Chen - $16 in deferred (its a higher calculation for luxury tax, but who cares with that)
Prado - $15
Castro - $11.8 + $1 buyout if not optioned (lets round this to $13)
Rojas, Conley, and Urena - Call them $6 combined
Everything else is club controlled for the minimum. Call this $12
=$62 million
Realmuto adds $6-7
Straily adds $4-5
Comment
Comment