Originally posted by rmc523
View Post
The reason i would be ok with then moving Pablo for 2 guys like that is because of a few things. First, any deal for reynolds would need to sign him to an extension. Because of that, given our limited payroll, it would become super key to start finding impact young talent for very cheap to supplement the big deal for Reynolds, Sandy as he gets more expensive, and then jazz as he inevitably gets more expensive through arbitration or hopefully an extension. If you trade for reynolds and sign him to an extension, if you dont find quality impact talent for cheap for a few years, you're left with the situation we were in with Stanton, Yelich, Ozuna, and JT where you have star level talent but a terrible bottom of the lineup.
So while maybe it's not the best move for this year, i think it would make sense in the totality of a plan where you also get reynolds and sign him to an extension. I think the biggest impact year for that kind of move would be 2024. All of a sudden, you have Reynolds, Sandy, Jazz, Segura, Garcia, etc., but then they also get supplemented with cheap impact talent like Luzardo, Cabrera, Eury, Busch, Vargas, hopefully bleday and Sanchez and then younger guys like Berry, Salas, watson, Cappe, Lewis, etc.
Also, while we have absolutely struck out on numerous prospects, most notably the MIlwaukee trade, as a small market team you can't just completely ignore those types of players as potential trade pieces. I think that's more of something that should cause you to fire scouts than to shy away from them entirely forever. As a small market team, 6 years of cheap impact talent is enormous. You can't just stay away from prospects. It's how you compete with the teams that spend $100 million more than you. It is the great equalizer in baseball with payroll disparities.
Comment