Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Miami Marlins to Change Logo for 2019

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by fish16 View Post
    why would that logo be laughably bad?
    If you have to ask why you won’t understsnd the explanation.

    Comment


    • #17
      2nd one looks like the Rays colors and Marlins in Red??? HELL NO

      First one is solid. But should make the Marlin Black and the M Teal. Teal and Black should be the color scheme no matter what!!!! No red or orange or anything. Teal/Black/White

      Comment


      • #18
        The “leaked” one is awful. Straight awful. Looks like a generic video game logo.

        The one with the block M and the Marlin in the center is amazing. The red one is my second favorite.
        Originally posted by Madman81
        Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
        Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM me!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by ¿NICK? View Post
          Not sure about the red, but the one on the right looks better.

          - - - - - - - - - -

          I just think the one on the left, all the black just blends together, the accent colors are so sparse that you can barely make anything out.
          I like the "feel" of the red one better, but hate the red - it's random and has no place in Miami AT ALL. I think the black more swoopy one would look a million times better if there weren't so much black in it.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by emkayseven View Post
            The “leaked” one is awful. Straight awful. Looks like a generic video game logo.

            The one with the block M and the Marlin in the center is amazing. The red one is my second favorite.
            I just think you should be able to differentiate between the Marlin and the M in the colors, I don't know the merging of the M and Fish into one shape just looks weird to me.

            - - - - - - - - - -

            ckhvh2kef8ignswrgxssk6jw3.jpg

            It doesn't have to look exactly like this, but bring back the detailed Marlin. All of these just look so lazy in comparison.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by ¿NICK? View Post
              I just think you should be able to differentiate between the Marlin and the M in the colors, I don't know the merging of the M and Fish into one shape just looks weird to me.

              - - - - - - - - - -

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]208[/ATTACH]

              It doesn't have to look exactly like this, but bring back the detailed Marlin. All of these just look so lazy in comparison.
              I really like that one. Seems like such an easy decision to go back to something similar to that.

              Comment


              • #22
                I did a few very quick variations of these two:

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by emkayseven View Post
                  The “leaked” one is awful. Straight awful. Looks like a generic video game logo.

                  The one with the block M and the Marlin in the center is amazing. The red one is my second favorite.
                  This is how I feel.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by emkayseven View Post
                    The “leaked” one is awful. Straight awful. Looks like a generic video game logo.

                    The one with the block M and the Marlin in the center is amazing. The red one is my second favorite.
                    I absolutely HATE the one with the marlin in the center. It looks like a Yankees knockoff or something.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I think the detailed marlin actually does make it look much better like I think Nick said. Id like some of those logos that rmc posted if they would detail the marlin more.

                      - - - - - - - - - -

                      Also it would look better if the marlin wasnt covering part of the top of the "M". the previous logo had the marlin behind the F at the top

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by fish16 View Post
                        I think the detailed marlin actually does make it look much better like I think Nick said. Id like some of those logos that rmc posted if they would detail the marlin more.

                        - - - - - - - - - -

                        Also it would look better if the marlin wasnt covering part of the top of the "M". the previous logo had the marlin behind the F at the top
                        You know.....it didn't even click that the marlin was now in front of the M at the top and behind it at the bottom (opposite of the setup since '93) until reading this post.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          This is it on a cap. Apparently waiting approval.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Coming from someone that really liked the rebrand when it came out on November 11th, 2011, my initial reaction to this rebrand is “holy shit that looks terrible”.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I actually don't mind the color scheme, but the logo comes off lazy and hackish to me.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I love that logo. I dont think thats it though cause of the increased orange type color. Id like that with the teal and silver instead of the orange.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X