If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Mainge might be right, probably is. Eovaldi and Alvarez both have good stuff, however. In a perfect world Eovlaldi would still be on the farm fine tuning his mediocre secondary offerings and Alvarez would, like, figure out how he doesnt strike anyone out. They both have the capability to be mid rotation guys IMO.
Amy Adams, AKA Cinnamon Muff
Logan Morrison: "If baseball didn't exist, I would probably be ... like a curler. Or a hairstylist."
Noah Perio
Jupiter
39 AB
15 H
0 2B
0 3B
0 HR
0 BB
.385/.385/.385
I pretty much agree, definitely 2 of the 3 things for sure. I would probably do Zunino/Walker and 2-3 more mid-level guys (legit mid-level top 15-20 prospects not mid-level meaning asshole Rabelos) personally. If doing dream scenario stuff.
Zunino sucks doe
and also he just got Sean Cunningham'd
Originally posted by Madman81
Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM me!
If they're pitching like this, I agree. But they're both probably pitching way over their heads.
I think if they're pitching like this, they're probably better than most 4/5s. I'd guess most 4s and 5s are super easily replaceable with crap. I think if they regress, they'd fit those spots fine.
I think if they're pitching like this, they're probably better than most 4/5s. I'd guess most 4s and 5s are super easily replaceable with crap. I think if they regress, they'd fit those spots fine.
Sure but the idea is that crap shouldn't prevent you from acquiring less crappy pitchers.
--------------------
So, last season.
He got one of the two.
Super impressive.
Last edited by Mainge; 08-01-2013, 09:19 PM.
Reason: Doublepost Merged
Comment