Passan's argument can be rebutted with the following statement that's actually made by Passan within the article.
Otherwise, it's the same old shit. Loria and Samson are clowns (which we knew), the money wasn't all put towards directly improving the on-field product (which we knew), blah blah *dismissive wank*.
Though the documents do not show that Loria has taken a direct distribution of money as owner,
Comment