Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Profitgate: Marlins Issue Official Statement Regarding Leaked Financials

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Profitgate: Marlins Issue Official Statement Regarding Leaked Financials

    Deadspin.com posted a bunch of MLB financial records on its website. Here are the Marlins 2008 and 2009 documents. Probably missing a few zeroes.

    I doubt they'll be up for long.

  • #2
    So according to official documents, they made $29,462,000 in 2008 and $3,900,000 in 2009 and that's taken their accumulated deficit from $173,661,000 to $140,292,000.
    --------------------
    Beef, please read these documents and then prepare a presentation for us.

    Thanks.
    Last edited by HUGG; 08-23-2010, 07:40 AM. Reason: Doublepost Merged

    Comment


    • #3
      I don't know how this compares to other figures posted on Marlins salaries, but total players compensation (including non-25 man roster, taxes, and contribution to MLB player's benefit plan) was $29,739,000 and $43,002,000.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm in class and the internet is going super slow - is there a depreciation schedge on there somewhere?

        Comment


        • #5
          It has accumulated depreciation on furniture/computer equip., baseball equip., other equip., and the baseball complex. Not much information, though. File #15.

          Comment


          • #6
            :mjpop

            Comment


            • #7
              $450K in parking revenue. That is beyond laughable.

              Comment


              • #8
                A bunch of other team's files are posted on that site, too. Deadspin is going to post more files later today and have an analysis of all of them.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Forbes' 2010 revenue estimate was off by $9 million.
                  --------------------
                  lol @ the Marlins spending $8M in marketing and advertising while the Rays spent $23M.
                  Last edited by Party; 08-23-2010, 08:46 AM. Reason: Doublepost Merged

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by TK-421 View Post
                    Forbes' 2010 revenue estimate was off by $9 million.
                    Over or under?
                    poop

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by TK-421 View Post
                      Forbes' 2010 revenue estimate was off by $9 million.
                      --------------------
                      lol @ the Marlins spending $8M in marketing and advertising while the Rays spent $23M.
                      I'm surprised this organization spent any money on advertising.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bobbob1313 View Post
                        Over or under?
                        Over.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Goodfella View Post
                          I'm surprised this organization spent any money on advertising.
                          all those super saturday acts don't come cheap... oh wait

                          Comment


                          • #14

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Honestly surprised a bigger deal isn't being made about this. Yeah it's not exactly unexpected, but it is revelatory of a pretty big problem.

                              Plus it's also funny the Marlins debunked Forbes' findings as baseless yet here they are trying to explain it away through "stadium saving."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X