Originally posted by Namaste
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2024-2025 Offseason Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by fish16 View Post
I think the odds are 22.45% for us so it's highly unlikely we get it. Given that we are the marlins, we will manage to slip way down. That's why i really think tanking is such a waste in a lot of these sports that have lottery's. even the worst teams odds are extremely low.
But also so often these teams go under slot, and on top of that, prospects’ careers rarely pan out according to their draft rankings. So while it would be really nice to pick 1st or 2nd, the better thing to hope for is they get lucky with whoever they pick.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fish16 View Post
I think the odds are 22.45% for us so it's highly unlikely we get it. Given that we are the marlins, we will manage to slip way down. That's why i really think tanking is such a waste in a lot of these sports that have lottery's. even the worst teams odds are extremely low.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nick View PostWho else is excited for another off-season of nothing?
meanwhile, Soto bidding is reportedly at a minimum of $600M.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Namaste View Post
No team in MLB has better odds of getting the 1st pick than the Marlins do
Comment
-
Originally posted by rmc523 View Post
I’ve recently found myself wondering why I’m even bothering to keep up with trade/signing rumors since we won’t do anything noteworthy.
meanwhile, Soto bidding is reportedly at a minimum of $600M.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Todd View PostThe amount of people online wanting to bring BDLC back is gross.
That being said, bring him back on a MiLB deal and try to time that one 5 week bender perfectly. Why not. Who cares. But that would be it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sports24/7 View Post
They have a 45% chance at a top 2 pick, which in this draft, feels like where you’d like to be. But like you said it’s the Marlins, so they’ll probably fall to like 7th.
But also so often these teams go under slot, and on top of that, prospects’ careers rarely pan out according to their draft rankings. So while it would be really nice to pick 1st or 2nd, the better thing to hope for is they get lucky with whoever they pick.
This team is bound to get good draft news with a bat eventually. It has been a long time. LaViolette going full Langford prospect status would be very welcome for CF as soon as 2026 optimistically.
Comment
-
But I came here to mention the Dodgers 26 man roster has more wealth in deferred money than Bruce Sherman does. And this is effectively the offseason they will probably break me as absent a salary cap it is going to get outrageous with top 5-10 spending teams very quickly with these $600m dollar deals. You can see cheap teams surviving if the big boys only spend high $100 millions, but these guys going into $250-300+m payrolls just completely wipes things out on a depth level. I can't see how anyone competes with what is about to happen in free agency. If you're not spending over $150m, you're going to be left behind in the dust. This sport needs a salary cap badly. I imagine the antitrust talk perks back up shortly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lou View Post
I think you can stretch that to 3 with Holliday, LaViolette, and Canarella, but preferably it is probably the first two as Canarella is sometimes push into 6-10 range in some mocks and the other two are effectively universal 1-2. I'd be thrilled with either on paper.
This team is bound to get good draft news with a bat eventually. It has been a long time. LaViolette going full Langford prospect status would be very welcome for CF as soon as 2026 optimistically.
Comment
Comment