Originally posted by Erick
View Post
I also think the statistics don't back that up all that much, beyond ERA.
He threw exactly as hard in 2009 as 2010, but was better one year than the other. Then his velocity dipped in 2011 and he was essentially the same pitcher anyways.
I don't think there's a strong enough correlation to just say "Velocity fell!" There are other indicators that show that his effectiveness is roughly the same.
--------------------
Originally posted by Erick
View Post
Nationals
White Sox
Tigers
Mariners
Dodgers
Cardinals
Rays
Yankees
Giants
Angels
Phillies
He would not be the best pitcher on those teams. That's probably the extent of it.
He is also being paid less than the best pitchers on eight of those teams.
--------------------
I feel like if JJ's ERA was 3.14 instead of 4.14, it would seem awfully ludicrous to say he's not an ace. But he's essentially pitching as well as he ever did, with the exception of 2010.
He has a 3.26 ERA since his first six starts. The argument is, essentially, that those six starts are enough to say "He is no longer an ace." I don't buy it.
Comment