I don't even know what you are saying anymore.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stark: Marlins Could Be Big Players This Off-Season UPDATE: All Big Names In Play
Collapse
X
-
The fuck is going on in here.
Anyways, I just looked at Jose Reyes numbers. I wasn't aware that he actually played so many games over the past couple of seasons, felt like he's been out forever. Not bad, but definitely not worth $100 million. 7/91 sounds about right for Jose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lilchris11 View Posthey your right the marlins wont be interstead in him. all im saying is that if a team needed him to play RF or LF he can do it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Erick View PostYeah but your original point was that we needed a CF'er. You said we need pitching, third base, and centerfielder when you brought up Beltran. This happened 3 pages ago.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Erick View PostOh. So that's why you brought up John Lackey. Makes sense now.
I will pretty plainly lay this out:
John Buck is in my opinion the worst every day catcher in baseball. He is going to a ballpark that is (again, my opinion) going to play big. Very big. I don't think he's going to be a bounce back guy next year. His numbers can't get much worse because, frankly, there's not a lot of room to drop unless he suffers some catastrophic injury.
John Lackey/AJ Burnett/Other Team's headache is a DFA candidate (certainly in the case of Lackey). If the money works, I think it makes sense to bring in one of those pitchers to a ballpark that plays "big" where, arguably, the best offensive player(s) in the division will be their teammates. A generally weak offensive NL East and a huge home ballpark tells me that there's a chance for a reclamation project somewhere.
I think that shedding deadweight (and I think Buck is unequivocally deadweight) for a roster spot that has no obligation with it (again, the Marlins would not take on cash in either of my scenarios) and freeing up cash to spend on someone worth it makes a ton of sense for the team.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stimpson J Cat View Post(and I think Buck is unequivocally deadweight) for a roster spot that has no obligation with it (again, the Marlins would not take on cash in either of my scenarios)
Also, John Buck was all of .025 OPS points below the average NL catcher. Not even getting into the fact that as Hugg pointed out, there was probably some bad luck along the way, you're really overstating how bad he was. Like a lot. He wasn't good, but for a catcher who played as often as he did, he was ok.Last edited by Bobbob1313; 09-29-2011, 11:28 PM.poop
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stimpson J Cat View PostThe Red Sox wanted Buck last offseason. I can't imagine many teams want him now. Lackey is a very real DFA risk. If you can unload deadweight, take on Lackey at the minimum, and then have $6 million to spend on someone worth it, that's improving the team.
I will pretty plainly lay this out:
John Buck is in my opinion the worst every day catcher in baseball. He is going to a ballpark that is (again, my opinion) going to play big. Very big. I don't think he's going to be a bounce back guy next year. His numbers can't get much worse because, frankly, there's not a lot of room to drop unless he suffers some catastrophic injury.
John Lackey/AJ Burnett/Other Team's headache is a DFA candidate (certainly in the case of Lackey). If the money works, I think it makes sense to bring in one of those pitchers to a ballpark that plays "big" where, arguably, the best offensive player(s) in the division will be their teammates. A generally weak offensive NL East and a huge home ballpark tells me that there's a chance for a reclamation project somewhere.
I think that shedding deadweight (and I think Buck is unequivocally deadweight) for a roster spot that has no obligation with it (again, the Marlins would not take on cash in either of my scenarios) and freeing up cash to spend on someone worth it makes a ton of sense for the team.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stimpson J Cat View PostThe Red Sox wanted Buck last offseason. I can't imagine many teams want him now. Lackey is a very real DFA risk. If you can unload deadweight, take on Lackey at the minimum, and then have $6 million to spend on someone worth it, that's improving the team.
I will pretty plainly lay this out:
John Buck is in my opinion the worst every day catcher in baseball. He is going to a ballpark that is (again, my opinion) going to play big. Very big. I don't think he's going to be a bounce back guy next year. His numbers can't get much worse because, frankly, there's not a lot of room to drop unless he suffers some catastrophic injury.
John Lackey/AJ Burnett/Other Team's headache is a DFA candidate (certainly in the case of Lackey). If the money works, I think it makes sense to bring in two pitchers to a ballpark that plays "big" where, arguably, the best offensive player(s) in the division will be their teammates. A generally weak offensive NL East and a huge home ballpark tells me that there's a chance for a reclamation project somewhere.
I think that shedding deadweight (and I think Buck is unequivocally deadweight) for a roster spot that has no obligation with it (again, the Marlins would not take on cash in either of my scenarios) and freeing up cash to spend on someone worth it makes a ton of sense for the team.
Saltalamacchia put up a 2.5 WAR for the Red Sox this year.
Ryan Lavarnway had a .290/.376/.563 this season in the minor leagues.
The Red Sox aren't as needy for a catcher as they were last offseason.
Even if they were in need of a catcher, no organization is retarded enough to pay the rest of John Lackey's contract + the rest of John Buck's contract.
The two trade ideas that you have come up with the past couple of days make no sense for any team. It's actually incredible. Normally, a silly offer ends up making sense for some team. This just fucks everyone up.
Comment
Comment