Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Confidence Poll: 8/16/2009

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Isn't Zimmerman out?
    God would be expecting a first pitch breaking ball in the dirt because humans love to disappoint him.
    - Daft

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Sub Zero View Post
      Isn't Zimmerman out?
      He played yesterday

      (maybe you're thinking of Jordan Zimmerman)

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Ramp View Post
        Isn't it Morgan-Guzman-Zimm-Dunn-Hammer-Dukes?

        If Hammer was on this team, he would start as well. His numbers this season are through the roof.
        And Morgan is > both our corner OFers. We'd probably go hammer/morgan/cody, which is certainly >>> coghlan/cody/hermida

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Swift View Post
          How on earth do they have a better lineup than ours?

          The only reason our aggregate numbers look so mediocre is that we gave 430 AB's to Emilio Bonifuckface.
          STANTON

          Serious fun! GET IT IN!

          Comment


          • #35
            Morgan over Coghlan? Really nny?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by McLevin View Post
              Morgan over Coghlan? Really nny?
              Yeah?

              The tiny advantage Coghlan has offensively is trashed by what Morgan has on a defensive advantage.

              I'd personally love to hear the arguement of how Coghlan should start over Morgan.
              Last edited by nny; 08-18-2009, 12:42 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Cody over Coglhan? If you have WIllingham in your "All FishNats" line-up I'll take CC for his versatility in the 1 or 2 spot over Cody's all or nothing swing in the 6,7, or 8.

                1. Morgan (8)
                2. CC (9)
                3. Hanley (6)
                4. Zimmerman (5)
                5. Dunn (3)
                6. Hammer (7)
                7. Uggla (4)
                8. Baker (2)
                STANTON

                Serious fun! GET IT IN!

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Swift View Post
                  I'm the farthest thing from a blind Marlins homer, but give our guys some credit. Morgan-Belliard--Zimm-Dunn-Hammer-Dukes is not better than Cogs-NJ-Hanley-Cantu-Baker-Uggla. And disregarding lineup spot, only Zimm and Dunn start over anyone on our roster at their position.
                  Also, I meant to do 1-5 so that's my own fault, and 1-5, we have 785 > 830 > 990 (wow hanley is getting up there) > 770 > 800

                  They have 750 > 750 > 900 > 1.000 > 1.000

                  they're 1-5 tears our 1-5 apart
                  --------------------
                  Originally posted by BigGameFish View Post
                  Cody over Coglhan? If you have WIllingham in your "All FishNats" line-up I'll take CC for his versatility in the 1 or 2 spot over Cody's all or nothing swing in the 6,7, or 8.

                  1. Morgan (8)
                  2. CC (9)
                  3. Hanley (6)
                  4. Zimmerman (5)
                  5. Dunn (3)
                  6. Hammer (7)
                  7. Uggla (4)
                  8. Baker (2)
                  Cody's all or nothing swing gives the same basic production, and Coghlan is a bad defensive LFer and Cody is a good defensive CFer. Cody is >> Coghlan when judging Coghlan as an OFer.
                  Last edited by nny; 08-18-2009, 12:31 PM. Reason: Doublepost Merged

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I agree when it comes to defense, but as you can tell that line-up I have there gives no importance to that. If we are factoring in defense I might consider leaving in Cody and swapping NJ with Dunn, sliding big Johnson into our second hole.
                    Last edited by BigGameFish; 08-18-2009, 12:42 PM.
                    STANTON

                    Serious fun! GET IT IN!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I think the whole topic kind got hodgepodged because we went from lineups to nationals starting on the marlins but also still talking about line ups

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Hahaha yes quite a confusing transition especially considering the thread topic. I dont think the Nats have ever been mentioned in a thread with the word "confidence" in the title
                        STANTON

                        Serious fun! GET IT IN!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X