Isn't Zimmerman out?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Confidence Poll: 8/16/2009
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ramp View PostIsn't it Morgan-Guzman-Zimm-Dunn-Hammer-Dukes?
If Hammer was on this team, he would start as well. His numbers this season are through the roof.
Comment
-
Originally posted by McLevin View PostMorgan over Coghlan? Really nny?
The tiny advantage Coghlan has offensively is trashed by what Morgan has on a defensive advantage.
I'd personally love to hear the arguement of how Coghlan should start over Morgan.Last edited by nny; 08-18-2009, 12:42 PM.
Comment
-
Cody over Coglhan? If you have WIllingham in your "All FishNats" line-up I'll take CC for his versatility in the 1 or 2 spot over Cody's all or nothing swing in the 6,7, or 8.
1. Morgan (8)
2. CC (9)
3. Hanley (6)
4. Zimmerman (5)
5. Dunn (3)
6. Hammer (7)
7. Uggla (4)
8. Baker (2)STANTON
Serious fun! GET IT IN!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Swift View PostI'm the farthest thing from a blind Marlins homer, but give our guys some credit. Morgan-Belliard--Zimm-Dunn-Hammer-Dukes is not better than Cogs-NJ-Hanley-Cantu-Baker-Uggla. And disregarding lineup spot, only Zimm and Dunn start over anyone on our roster at their position.
They have 750 > 750 > 900 > 1.000 > 1.000
they're 1-5 tears our 1-5 apart
--------------------
Originally posted by BigGameFish View PostCody over Coglhan? If you have WIllingham in your "All FishNats" line-up I'll take CC for his versatility in the 1 or 2 spot over Cody's all or nothing swing in the 6,7, or 8.
1. Morgan (8)
2. CC (9)
3. Hanley (6)
4. Zimmerman (5)
5. Dunn (3)
6. Hammer (7)
7. Uggla (4)
8. Baker (2)
Comment
-
I agree when it comes to defense, but as you can tell that line-up I have there gives no importance to that. If we are factoring in defense I might consider leaving in Cody and swapping NJ with Dunn, sliding big Johnson into our second hole.Last edited by BigGameFish; 08-18-2009, 12:42 PM.STANTON
Serious fun! GET IT IN!
Comment
Comment