Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bo Porter Confuses Jeff Keppinger for Juan Pierre, Fish Still Win in Extras 9-8
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mbaamin08 View PostDidn't realize that about the ump. Good call. The small strike zone could have contributed as well.
Anibal has two more starts. The 21st is what I heard last. We'll probably need him in place of West or RVH though.
Comment
-
-
Well, I think it was somewhat silly to expect Volstad to be this bad heading into the season given that he was an unknown (relatively) and his minor league numbers were encouraging, albeit slightly average. He never blew threw a level, and always allowed a lot of hits, but he did an excellent job of limiting the long-ball.
Now, he's just fucking abysmal, and I think it's pure craziness to just say he'll rebound, he's fine and it's just not his fault; it's the strike-zone, or the rain, or the fans, or the offense, or the defense.
He can still have a great career, but his 2009 is a lost cause and I hope we take any steps to ease him out of positions of consequence if the situation allows.
Comment
-
I never said anything was getting old.
I think what was getting old to people was you and McLevin not understanding my point, which was totally accurate, that Nolasco is going to be really fucking bad if he gives up extra base hits.
Meanwhile, the rain comment stands as one of the four or five greatest excuses ever offered. I don't think there's any misinterpretation there, the threat of rain threw him off his game.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Swift View PostWell, I think it was somewhat silly to expect Volstad to be this bad heading into the season given that he was an unknown (relatively) and his minor league numbers were encouraging, albeit slightly average. He never blew threw a level, and always allowed a lot of hits, but he did an excellent job of limiting the long-ball.
I personally expected him to be a 4 - 4.5 era pitcher (More 4 with 4.5 being the highend). I thought 5 era was high, but not impossible like most people who saw it said. He was very "lucky" last season. BABIP, LOB%, HR/FB%. His season last year got him overrated by a lot of people do to the flashy and sex sub-3 ERA.
The computer projections are completely unbiased and simply negated his luck from last season. And whaddayaknow, they aren't far off.
he 'shouldn't' continue to be this bad as now his HR/FB is on the other end of the spectrum, and he should fall down to the normal 11%ish rnage. But, again, we're still then only talking of a 4 to 4.5 era pitcher.
The one positive sign to take away from this season though is his BB/9. That's the one area where he's really beating his projections. Last year it was 3.84 (3.5 = average), this season it's just 2.70. Though you do have to wonder if some of that is to blame for the HRs he's given up. Shrug.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MiamiHomer View PostSome others used the rain comment in the game thread today. Just sayin'
That excuse was just too rich. And, well, it did rain today
Hey guys, we did win today! Gained a game on the WC even!God would be expecting a first pitch breaking ball in the dirt because humans love to disappoint him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FishFF View PostSwift your comments for Nolasco were just as comical. You think by saying, Oh I mean I hope he does well and I want the Marlins to win in the end makes it less comical?
He's a roller-coaster of a pitcher. At the start of the season he was clearly not pitching well. I've maintained the whole time he's excellent at not walking guys and at striking people out. He gives up his fair share of extra base hits and his stuff is remarkably consistent. You can't even necessarily look at him and say "wow, his curveball is extra sharp tonight" because he almost always goes to the mound with the same stuff and the same control of that stuff. That his success is so dependent on two or three running grabs in the gap is concerning to me.
Quite honestly, it's the most transparent analysis I've ever made. There isn't some great underlying meaning to it, and, correct me if you disagree here, it's rather accurate. Nolasco is a great no-walk, high strikeout guy who seriously sucks when he's allowing extra base hits. There is nothing else to make of his success other than the XBH. He's never going to walk 7, he's never going to K just 1 or 2. That you're looking for some hidden meaning, or trying to assign value to what you feel to be between the lines vitriol I can often be known for is not my fault. Allow me, if you will, this instance of overly simplistic analysis. Should you so desire, we can continue this conversation further if you disagree with my analysis, but in a purely rudimentary discussion of a pitcher's worth, I hope we are all on the same page regarding Nolasco's strengths (no walks) and weaknesses (XBH).
And allow me to also make a self-promoting plug and say that since I cannot attend the game tomorrow, my seats are for sale on stub-hub at serious cut rate prices, and you can enjoy Nolasco's start in comfort, with waitress service.
Comment
Comment