I think he knew what he was getting into.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Uggla Contract Negotiations
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Bobbob1313 View PostHe also walks a ton and before this year hit for very good power.
And power, not really. ISO by season:
2007: .179
2008: .185
2009: .227
2010: .185
1) One of these things is not like the others. Reason? Park. Hagers is hitters park, others are neutral.
2) His one big year wasn't really "very good power." It's basic power hitting range. He's probably a ~.175 ISO guy (Above average power) but probably only hits .200+ (power hitter range) in prime and such if he develops completely correctly.
I don't have access to my spreadsheets for easy ability to produce a line but quick eyeballing, with drop in walk rates, and your general raise in K rates/drop in babip/etc that almost always comes from minors -> majors, He's probably something like .240/.340/.415/.755. That's real nice from a C, especially with his defense. He's very much a good prospect and it'd be awesome if we get him. But he likely aint a supah star. He certainly got potential to grow off that but he also got a good bust potential with that high K rate.
Like him more than JP though. Big power numbers in a hitters park for the PCL which is already a hitters league and people love him again. I mean, BB/K did increase. But he still don't walk and still strikes out more than you'd want.Last edited by nny; 11-16-2010, 02:26 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CrimsonCane View PostNothing in that article suggests that 4/$52 is fair value for Uggla. Dan Uggla is not Chase Utley.
You're crazy man. I like you, but you're crazy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ramp View PostI'm not 100% sold on that idea
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cody Ross Chant View PostWhy do people cite MLBTR?
It is Rotoworld with less credibility.
The comment/message boards though.... it makes MB look like MENSA
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Matt Wilson View PostAre you suggesting that by making comparisons to MVP-caliber players that were signed at younger ages to smaller contracts, he does not effectively make the case that a player who never has been and never will be MVP material, who is also in his 30s, and likely just peaked, should get a bigger contract?
You're crazy man. I like you, but you're crazy.
Comment
Comment