I think he is not comparing them, but rather showing that it's easy to put too much into ST success and that is maybe not a good idea.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mike Stanton Wants to Be a Major Leaguer Now
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bobbob1313 View PostI think he is not comparing them, but rather showing that it's easy to put too much into ST success and that is maybe not a good idea.Amy Adams, AKA Cinnamon MuffLogan Morrison: "If baseball didn't exist, I would probably be ... like a curler. Or a hairstylist."
Jupiter
39 AB
15 H
0 2B
0 3B
0 HR
0 BB
.385/.385/.385
Comment
-
Posted this at the other place. By no means saying Stanton will = Gentile, especially since you have to consider Gentile made his debut so late, but I found it interesting
Here's one name I just came across. Jim Gentile
A ball-
Gentile: .270, 34 HRs (537 AB, 19yo)
Stanton: .293, 39 HRs (468 AB, 18yo)
A+ ball-
Gentile: .314, 26 HRs (462 AB, 20yo)
Stanton: .293, 12 HRs (180 AB, 19yo)
AA call up same season-
Gentile: .233, 8 HRs (120 AB, 20yo)
Stanton: .231, 16 HRs (299 AB, 19yo)
Gentile was a year older, but their averages and HRs were basically the same. I was real surprised that I'd find somebody who matched Stanton so well in AVG/HR, and meet the caveat of A, A+, and AA in 2 years. Don't know about strike outs, strike outs weren't recorded in the minor leagues back then.
For some reason, Gentile wouldn't make the majors until he was 26. He'd absolutely DEMOLISH minor league pitching for years until he made his debut. He'd only play for 7 seasons, but would hit .261/.370/.489/.859 with a 137 OPS+ (To compare that number to someone this day and age, Hanley's career OPS+ is 138) and average 31 HRs per 600 PA
Comment
Comment