It's not really defending yourself though. It's maintaing what you have admitted to be "excuses" and nothing overly based in merit.
There's nothing wrong with opinion, but when it's based on nothing but inconsistency in evaluation (see: West -v- Volstad) people are going to tire of it quickly.
Either call a problem a problem, or be hopelessly (charmingly?) oblivious to every player's short comings, but don't pick and choose the spots to fawn.
There's nothing wrong with opinion, but when it's based on nothing but inconsistency in evaluation (see: West -v- Volstad) people are going to tire of it quickly.
Either call a problem a problem, or be hopelessly (charmingly?) oblivious to every player's short comings, but don't pick and choose the spots to fawn.
Comment