Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nny Doesn't Like Our Playoff Odds Next Season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nny Doesn't Like Our Playoff Odds Next Season

    I think we're a lock for another mid 80 season but luck would have to roll our way for us to win over 90 games

    dodododoodo





    I mean, I really don't think that's asking for much. It's asking for Nolasco to not but unlucky, for Volstad's HRs to normalize, for West's rates to normalize to mid-rotation starter, and for minor progression from Andrew. And that's with JJ getting knocked up. I really don't think it's asking much for our 3-5 to put up between 4.30-4.50 ERAs. And don't put too much stock into what IP I gave up pitcher for those 4 since they're so interchangeable, that's not the point.

    I mean, that's basically saying we'll have the same rotation next year as this year with minor progression. So if we give our bullpen 254 runs aginst (~4.20 ERA), and our rotation 476 runs against (~4.18 ERA), that's a total of 730 runs.

    We have no idea what our defense will be now but let's just say it's average because of Uggla and Coghlan being gone/shifting. Actually let's say it's -10 because of our catchers. So our new runs given up is 740 runs.

    I'd say, playoffs in mind, our goal should be 92 wins. 2002 was the last time 92 wins didn't get you into the playoffs in the NL.

    If we gave up 740 runs, that would require us to score some 850 runs. This would require about a .785 OPS. We have a .759 OPS this season, and it very likely is going down instead of up.

    I think it's a lot more likely we're around the, say, 780 mark (~.755 OPS). That's basically keeping cody and cantu, for simplicity sake. That'd put us at 85 wins.

    Now let's say we have two break outs in our rotation to 4 eras. My two favorites for that would be West and Sanchez at this point in time but again names are interchangable.

    That lowers our rotation runs given up to 459, or 723 runs total given up. If we again assume 780 runs, that puts us up to 87 wins.

    I'd say I don't like our playoff odds too much at the moment.

    For what the original thread is about, what would need to change is for us to have two break outs in the rotation, our bullpen to perform better than average (if we perform at something like a, say, 4 ERA again, that lowers our runs given up by another 11), and for something like Logan Morrison to bust out the gates crushing cherries.

    So let's say our staff is good, we get two break outs and a 4 era from bp. let's say 710 runs given up. That'd require 815 runs scored, or about .765-.770 OPS, to win 92 games.

    man winning 90 games is hard

  • #2
    Asking for a ~4.00 FIP from Anibal, Miller, or Volstad, individually, is probably fair. But asking all three of them to produce at that level is pretty unrealistic. Counting on improvement from those 3 the starters (whether it's actual improvement or just stuff normalizing) AND from Nolasco (even though it's again maybe mostly luck) is asking too much.

    But other than that, yeah, gonna be tough.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by wanks1212 View Post
      Asking for a ~4.00 FIP from Anibal, Miller, or Volstad, individually, is probably fair. But asking all three of them to produce at that level is pretty unrealistic. Counting on improvement from those 3 the starters (whether it's actual improvement or just stuff normalizing) AND from Nolasco (even though it's again maybe mostly luck) is asking too much.

      But other than that, yeah, gonna be tough.
      ignore fip and look at era. fip's just htere to look pretty. I have them at 4.30-4.50 era form tra

      Comment


      • #4
        You also have to imagine that it will be difficult for the Mets to be this bad/injured again.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by The_Godfather View Post
          You also have to imagine that it will be difficult for the Mets to be this bad/injured again.
          Their SP is pretty fucking bad. And is going to be for awhile besides Santana.

          Comment


          • #6
            So I just did the line up.



            .757 OPS not far off the .755 ops I said above. XR is better for team stats but it overrates a bit it seems so let's just still stay with 780 runs like I said above yeah?

            here's the thing.

            We're currently about +1.4 runs base running this year as a team. We're getting rid of Nick Johnson and Hermida (combined -6 runs). That already puts us up at seven and a half runs. Then add in having Maybin and ect in the line up. We could probably get into the teens with that line up but I think +10 is a good conservative number. That already knocks us up to 790

            Then you look at defense, mostly thanks to starting BC. let's been a bit more conservative and say +20 instead of +30.

            So we're now at 790 runs scored and 710 runs against.

            That puts us at 89 wins

            But that's also projecting 150 games played for each position player. Could probably knock the runs back to 780 but we're still talking about an upper 80 win team probably

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by lou View Post
              Their SP is pretty fucking bad. And is going to be for awhile besides Santana.
              I think the most amazing thing about the Mets is that one offseason could turn them into a power house.

              I think the biggest question is how much do they have to spend. I know they're having some financial difficulties so if it becomes cost cutting then it becomes a lot harder. I mean, Delgado is really their only chunk of change coming off of the books but you're also looking at pay raises to a hell of a lot of players to probably null that.

              Pelfrey's (4.36 FIP this season, 4.31 career) an ok #3, you could do worse than Maine as your #4 (4.85 FIP this season, 4.63 FIP career), and Oliver Perez isn't a bad #5 if he's healthy with his upside (4.78 career FIP, but a couple scattered good FIP seasons).

              If they went out and got an ok #2 like Pavano, Duchscherer, Smoltz, see if Pettite will go across town (though I'm guessing it's NYY, HOU, or bust), ect, they still have a below average rotation but it's not horrible. If they go out and sign a bunch of #5's again like they did last season though then their definitely looking at a repeat.

              And I think it's a lot more likely they're a top-5 offensive team again next year. And I'd assume their BP acts around what they have been this year (4.20 fip aka average).

              I'd say right now their probably a low-80 win team.

              Phillies, I think their acquisition of cliff lee puts them over us. If you match their rotation to ours

              Cliff Lee > Josh Johnson
              Cole Hamels = Ricky Nolasco
              Happ and Blanton = two our mid rotation guys

              So it all comes down to who their #5 is. if it's Moyer we probably beat them there. But they could also go out and top our rotation.

              BP, they have a 4.28 FIP this season but I think that lowers next year with Lidge not being so awesomely bad. So I think we can say average there too, wash between our three BPs.

              But they have the best defense of the three, and the best offense of the three.

              I'd say right now
              Phillies = high 80, low 90 win team
              marlins = mid 80 to high 80 win team
              mets = low 80 to mid 80 win team

              And then that leaves the braves

              they have the best bullpen this season and although they like Mike Gonz and Rafeal Soriano they still have real legit arms in that pen and imma say their pen is the best in the east.

              Their rotation is easily the best. I mean, pre-season we acted all high and mighty about our rotation but jesus christ and what they have going into their rotation next year. 5 guys, FIVE GUYS, have under a 4 FIP this season. Their 6th best starter has a 4.32 FIP and would probably be our third best starter.

              And their offense should be a lot better next year with a full year of McClouth, a full year of not having Jeff Francouer.

              We obviously have a long time before next year but right now my power rankings would probably be

              Atl
              phil
              us
              mets

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm not particularly a fan of Uggla and Hermida, but when you replace their production with Maybin and Bonifacio, well then you're pretty crappy on offense.
                Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM Hugg!

                Comment

                Working...
                X