'98 Marlins Watch

[Chewford]

Fun fact: the 1962 Mets didn't sweep a 3 game series the entire season

To be fair, the 62 Mets didn't have the opportunity of playing the New York Mets.

[Fritz]

So what you're saying is they've never beaten the Mets?

[Erick]

I think we're better than the 2013 Astros. On paper, we definitely are. (talking about our healthy team, not the one that just swept the Mets)

[Beef]

Agreed. A Samson success.

[Omar]

Through 58 games:

2013 Miami Marlins   16-42  --
2003 Detroit Tigers  16-42  --
1962 New York Mets   16-42  --

Game 59 Results:

62 NYM: LOSS
03 DET: LOSS

Current Projected Record: 45-117
Current Projected Pyth Record: 55-107

Current Projected Run Differential: -218

Fun Fact: Namaste has started almost a third (29%) of the game threads this year, with a record of 10-7. Every one else is 6-34, which would be good for a winning percentage of .150.

[Omar]

Through 60 games:

2013 Miami Marlins   16-44  --
2003 Detroit Tigers  16-44  --
1962 New York Mets   16-44  --

Game 61 Results:

62 NYM: LOSS
03 DET: LOSS

Current Projected Record: 43-119
Current Projected Pyth Record: 53-109

Current Projected Run Differential: -235

Fun Fact: dgriot, who started his first game thread today, joins 15 other posters in having negative run differentials for the season.

[Erick]

Through 58 games:

2013 Miami Marlins   16-42  --
2003 Detroit Tigers  16-42  --
1962 New York Mets   16-42  --

Game 59 Results:

62 NYM: LOSS
03 DET: LOSS

Current Projected Record: 45-117
Current Projected Pyth Record: 55-107

Current Projected Run Differential: -218

Fun Fact: Namaste has started almost a third (29%) of the game threads this year, with a record of 10-7. Every one else is 6-34, which would be good for a winning percentage of .150.

Impressive

[AdamRavs]

No game tonight boys. We put history on hold

[CrimsonCane]

Fun Fact: Namaste has started almost a third (29%) of the game threads this year, with a record of 10-7. Every one else is 6-34, which would be good for a winning percentage of .150.

This isn't as statistically improbable as you would think. He is allowed to make consecutive game threads when we win but can't make the next game thread if we have lost. And he cant start a new thread until theres been at least 1 new loss.

Considering how often he has started game threads, he will probably fare better than our win percentage.

[HUGG]

boom, CC'd

[Ramp]

nailed it

[Beef]

Plus he knows when to not start a game thread even after a win

[Ramp]

HOW DID HE KNOW!?

[Namaste]

BURIED

[Beef]

On pace for 496 runs now

489