Burdick as I said with a really nice start to spring and he looks to have gotten even more ripped over the offseason. 2 run opposite field shot off of right and 12 year in a row top prospect Forrest Whitley
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2022-2023 Offseason Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by fish16 View PostGroshans is starting at 1b today. If he could play there as well on top of 3b and ss, gotta think he will end up as the last bat in the bench to start the year
Forest Whitley is also far from a top prospect. He faded with the injuries.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lou View Post
I mean we know this already? The last spot is an infielder and his competition is frankly LeBlanc, or they keep Burdick and mess with Jazz's head and have him play a lot of IF time shifting guys around.
Forest Whitley is also far from a top prospect. He faded with the injuries.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fish16 View Post
I’m aware, I was joking. He was on the top prospect list and thought highly of for like 6 years and fell off due to like 4 straight years of injuries. He is their sixto
Comment
-
the way too early bright spots through 3 games of spring that mean absolutely nothing are Burdick, Groshans, DLC, and berti's speed. the pitching has been terrible, but everyone is just getting ready so spring training is pretty meaningless. stats especially at the end of spring will be even more meaningless this year with all the WBC defections.
I think Burdick lost prospect status coming up at the end of last year, but id be interested to see where he would be on the lists if he was still eligible. I love his profile if he can learn to hit righties even a little bit better. He struggled a bit in his first AAA action last year and he isnt a young prospect, but i love the tools and profile. Huge power, good athleticism, draws a lot of walks. At a floor he should be a great platoon guy with Sanchez. If he learns how to hit righties consistently he is an everyday player as soon as later this year if there is a spot open.Last edited by fish16; 02-27-2023, 03:59 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fish16 View Postthe way too early bright spots through 3 games of spring that mean absolutely nothing are Burdick, Groshans, DLC, and berti's speed. the pitching has been terrible, but everyone is just getting ready so spring training is pretty meaningless. stats especially at the end of spring will be even more meaningless this year with all the WBC defections.
I think Burdick lost prospect status coming up at the end of last year, but id be interested to see where he would be on the lists if he was still eligible. I love his profile if he can learn to hit righties even a little bit better. He struggled a bit in his first AAA action last year and he isnt a young prospect, but i love the tools and profile. Huge power, good athleticism, draws a lot of walks. At a floor he should be a great platoon guy with Sanchez. If he learns how to hit righties consistently he is an everyday player as soon as later this year if there is a spot open.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sports24/7 View PostI think I've said this before, but the fact that the Marlins don't wear anything like these blue spring training uniforms in-season is insane. I also think the logo on their hats should be their main logo. It's so much better than the M.Amy Adams, AKA Cinnamon MuffLogan Morrison: "If baseball didn't exist, I would probably be ... like a curler. Or a hairstylist."
Jupiter
39 AB
15 H
0 2B
0 3B
0 HR
0 BB
.385/.385/.385
- 1 like
Comment
-
What do you guys think of the rule changes so far? I really like the pitch clock, but i think they might eventually shift to 20 seconds instead of 15. 15 seems just a bit rushed to me. At the very least, i love the much faster pace of the game. the combination of the shift and the slow pace of play made baseball unwatchable because you could go 30 minutes of real time without a ball actually put in play. I like that the lack of the shift will lead to more base hits and the bigger bases will bring steals back into play a bit. In the past i get why baseball shifted to the all or nothing, home run or strikeout outcome style, but it was terrible from a fan experience. It will be an adjustment for sure, but there is no need for games to take 3-3.5 hours every single night, regardless of the score. the whole hitter stepping out of the box and adjusting his cup and batting gloves after every pitch was ridiculous.
Now if we can get robo umps in the next year we're really talking about baseball finally acting in their own best interest and not relying on the stupid "tradition" argument. I get umps are a lot better than they are given credit for and have gotten much better over the last 10 years, my argument has always been that if you have the technology to be perfect, it's stupid not to be. IF the technology isnt there, then by all means keep with normal umps, but its 2023, everyone at home can immediately determine whether a call was accurate or not, it's stupid that we still rely on middle aged men with cataracts to call balls and strikes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lee Stone View PostAnd former Marlin Luke Williams homered for the Dodgers.
Speaking of the 40 man, they also have Meyer, Bender, and Enright still on the 40 man, so they have room for 3 moves at any time. I suspect they are waiting for last guys to be released later in the spring as they can add LeBlanc, Hampson, and Hinojosa (all have options) whenever and don't need to do it now. It's too bad Smeltzer is OOO. I think he might be sneaky pretty OK but he'd have to be a permanent call up. This just gets me back to why did they keep Brazoban over Neidert or Poteet. Hopefully they know what they are doing there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fish16 View PostWhat do you guys think of the rule changes so far? I really like the pitch clock, but i think they might eventually shift to 20 seconds instead of 15. 15 seems just a bit rushed to me. At the very least, i love the much faster pace of the game. the combination of the shift and the slow pace of play made baseball unwatchable because you could go 30 minutes of real time without a ball actually put in play. I like that the lack of the shift will lead to more base hits and the bigger bases will bring steals back into play a bit. In the past i get why baseball shifted to the all or nothing, home run or strikeout outcome style, but it was terrible from a fan experience. It will be an adjustment for sure, but there is no need for games to take 3-3.5 hours every single night, regardless of the score. the whole hitter stepping out of the box and adjusting his cup and batting gloves after every pitch was ridiculous.
Now if we can get robo umps in the next year we're really talking about baseball finally acting in their own best interest and not relying on the stupid "tradition" argument. I get umps are a lot better than they are given credit for and have gotten much better over the last 10 years, my argument has always been that if you have the technology to be perfect, it's stupid not to be. IF the technology isnt there, then by all means keep with normal umps, but its 2023, everyone at home can immediately determine whether a call was accurate or not, it's stupid that we still rely on middle aged men with cataracts to call balls and strikes.
Frankly, I think they can extend the pitch clock a little and speed up the half innings to deflect the time. Basically, having rolling on-screen ads (+ on jerseys) and have two big "stretches" after the third and mid-7th which effectively would be extended commercial breaks/beer runs like a hockey intermission (like 10 minutes). Teams can have their dumb mascot races after the 3rd, etc. Basically, shave 1-2 minutes every half inning and you'll shave 10+ minutes off the game even with some longer "stretches." The advertisers will still eat.
Throw in a few more minutes with a roboump, faster replay from a league office, keeping the pitch clock, policing mound visits, minimum RP standards, not throwing 4 balls for IBB, etc., and this easily becomes a 7-930 entertainment event.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lou View Post
Anything that gets games to 2.5 hours is worth it IMO.
Frankly, I think they can extend the pitch clock a little and speed up the half innings to deflect the time. Basically, having rolling on-screen ads (+ on jerseys) and have two big "stretches" after the third and mid-7th which effectively would be extended commercial breaks/beer runs like a hockey intermission (like 10 minutes). Teams can have their dumb mascot races after the 3rd, etc. Basically, shave 1-2 minutes every half inning and you'll shave 10+ minutes off the game even with some longer "stretches." The advertisers will still eat.
Throw in a few more minutes with a roboump, faster replay from a league office, keeping the pitch clock, policing mound visits, minimum RP standards, not throwing 4 balls for IBB, etc., and this easily becomes a 7-930 entertainment event.
I get why the game has shifted to focusing on home runs and being ok with strikeouts, but it's terrible for the game. The shift being gone will put an emphasis back on putting the ball in play, and while thats not "sexy," it's better from a viewer standpoint where there is more action. I said it yesterday, but i think it will increase offense and batting average. With last years rules and with how advanced the statistical analysis has gotten, it was so fucking hard to simply hit a single. You can say just hit it the other way, and to an extent that is true, but i thought it was bad for the game even if it was just a simple statistical analysis of where guys tended to hit the ball. I think the amount of singles this year are going to sky rocket and that's better for the game than nothing but home runs and strikeouts.
Comment
Comment