Originally posted by lilchris11
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
We Can Compete for the Division, Amirite?
Collapse
X
-
With JJ's injury history, I don't think we are a playoff team yet. But we're much improved and will be in the hunt into mid-September at least.
I'd feel much more confident if we added another starter without sacrificing a ton of majors level talent.God would be expecting a first pitch breaking ball in the dirt because humans love to disappoint him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Omar View PostWith JJ's injury history, I don't think we are a playoff team yet. But we're much improved and will be in the hunt into mid-September at least.
I'd feel much more confident if we added another starter without sacrificing a ton of majors level talent.
I agree with your last sentence, though.
Comment
-
I don't know, shoulder injuries worry me. It also worries me tremendously that what was allegedly a day to day injury caused him to miss 3/4 of the season. That's not something a playoff team can afford to have with their ace, especially in a park that will (more than likely) severely depress offensive output.God would be expecting a first pitch breaking ball in the dirt because humans love to disappoint him.
Comment
-
If we had gotten CJ, I would say yes. Now I would say it depends on JJ's health.
With how desperate we seemed to be to sign CJ at all costs, I would say we're going to get another one way or another before this offseason is over though.Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM Hugg!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chewie View PostIf we had gotten CJ, I would say yes. Now I would say it depends on JJ's health.
With how desperate we seemed to be to sign CJ at all costs, I would say we're going to get another one way or another before this offseason is over though.
I also love that we got Buehrle so now (theoretically) we don't need to worry about that next starter's handedness.
Comment
-
Nolasco's a great #4, problem is, we don't have a great #3. (Although if you tell me contract year brings it out of Anibal, I think I can get on board with that).
Ideally, with such a huge question mark with JJ as the #1, you'd like to make Nolasco the #5.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Swifty View PostNolasco's a great #4, problem is, we don't have a great #3. (Although if you tell me contract year brings it out of Anibal, I think I can get on board with that).
Ideally, with such a huge question mark with JJ as the #1, you'd like to make Nolasco the #5.
This thread is under the assumption that JJ gives us 180 innings (which is something he did the two years before last). If JJ gets hurt again and only gives us 60 innings or whatever, we're screwed regardless of what the rest of our rotation looks like.
Comment
Comment