Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hanley and .400

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16

    Comment


    • #17
      .489 since the creation of the thread (23/47)

      Would have to hit .553 in September (57/103)

      Something different to track though:

      This is the latest Hanley has broken the 1.000 barrier

      His previous latest he set this year actually. May 19th.

      Before that, it was May 5th in '07.

      Here's the doozie: In his career, Hanley has a OPS over 1.000 in September. Only once did he not break a 1.000 OPS for the month, in 2007 when it was only .970.

      The Marlins have only had one previous 1.000 OPS hitter. Gary Sheffield, 2006.

      Only three shortstops in the history of the game have finished the season with a OPS over 1.000: Alex Rodriguez (4 times), Nomar Garciapara (2 times), and Arky Vaughan (1 time, who also holds the OPS record at 1.098)

      Comment


      • #18
        Arky was the best draft pick I made in 1935.... 4th round pick... so money

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Ramp View Post
          Arky was the best draft pick I made in 1935.... 4th round pick... so money
          Came 3rd in MVP that year

          Comment


          • #20
            Just imagine having Miguel and Hanley back to back on this roster. Imagine it. I dare you.

            We had two of the best hitters of this generation on the same team... Oh what could have been.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Flum View Post
              Just imagine having Miguel and Hanley back to back on this roster. Imagine it. I dare you.

              We had two of the best hitters of this generation on the same team... Oh what could have been.
              From the other place:

              If we kept Miguel, Hammer, and A-Gon, we'd have 4 batters with .950+ OPS.

              only 3 times has a team finished with 4 batters with a .950+ OPS

              1929 NL Chicago Cubs 4 Rogers Hornsby / Hack Wilson / Kiki Cuyler / Riggs Stephenson
              1895 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Sam Thompson / Ed Delahanty / Jack Clements
              1894 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Ed Delahanty / Sam Thompson / Tuck Turner

              Comment


              • #22
                But we have Emilio Bonifacio

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by nny View Post
                  From the other place:

                  If we kept Miguel, Hammer, and A-Gon, we'd have 4 batters with .950+ OPS.

                  only 3 times has a team finished with 4 batters with a .950+ OPS

                  1929 NL Chicago Cubs 4 Rogers Hornsby / Hack Wilson / Kiki Cuyler / Riggs Stephenson
                  1895 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Sam Thompson / Ed Delahanty / Jack Clements
                  1894 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Ed Delahanty / Sam Thompson / Tuck Turner
                  Fuck A Gon and the .950 OPSesseess. We'd have no 2nd world series with them. I'm happy where we are. Cool stat though...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by The_Godfather View Post
                    Fuck A Gon and the .950 OPSesseess. We'd have no 2nd world series with them. I'm happy where we are. Cool stat though...
                    Agreed, however, hindsight being 20/20 we should've given up on Jason Stokes instead.
                    This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                      Agreed, however, hindsight being 20/20 we should've given up on Jason Stokes instead.
                      then we'd have no johnny bake
                      Originally posted by Madman81
                      Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
                      Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM me!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Forget having Miggy. Imagine if we got something of value for him in the trade. We'd be good.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Caught this tweet last night from Jon Heyman:

                          at marlins game as fan. just for hanley (3 for 3 so far, .365), worth admission price.

                          Hey, whatever it lacks in poetry it makes up for in clarity.

                          I knew, in a sort of off-handed way, that Hanley Ramirez is enjoying yet another brilliant season. But after looking at his actual season, I've come to believe that he must be the most underrated player in the major leagues and that probably nobody else is really all that close.

                          I also "knew" that Albert Pujols is so far ahead of everyone else in the National League that he's basically had the MVP locked up since Memorial Day. I don't get the impression that anyone's even talking about any other candidates. Somebody asks, "Who's the MVP in the National League?" and you say "Why, Albert Pujols of course!" And then it's on to the next burning topic.

                          Let's got back to this one for a minute, though. According to FanGraphs, there's virtually no difference this season between Pujols, Ramirez, and Chase Utley (which shouldn't be a big surprise, as those three have been among the league's best for three years running).

                          Granted, you'll get a different answer if you look at different metrics, at least one of which has Pujols way ahead of everyone else ... except for Tim Lincecum, who with a dozen wins in late August isn't anyone's -- well, except Jonah Keri -- idea of an MVP candidate.

                          Maybe Pujols really is the best player in the National League. He probably is. But there's a .365-hitting shortstop with power, playing for a contending team. Shouldn't we at least take a deep breath and think a few thoughts?

                          http://myespn.go.com/blogs/sweetspot
                          Originally posted by Madman81
                          Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
                          Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM me!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            It's rather presumptuous to say we won the world series because of that trade. I hate that that's brought up every time that trade is brought up.

                            We won the world series with making that trade, we did not win the world series because of that trade

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by markotsay7 View Post
                              then we'd have no johnny bake
                              Adrian Gonzalez + Paulino + Dooo-dooo > Bake
                              This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Actually we could have Johnny Bake still without Stokes

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X