Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hanley and .400
Collapse
X
-
.489 since the creation of the thread (23/47)
Would have to hit .553 in September (57/103)
Something different to track though:
This is the latest Hanley has broken the 1.000 barrier
His previous latest he set this year actually. May 19th.
Before that, it was May 5th in '07.
Here's the doozie: In his career, Hanley has a OPS over 1.000 in September. Only once did he not break a 1.000 OPS for the month, in 2007 when it was only .970.
The Marlins have only had one previous 1.000 OPS hitter. Gary Sheffield, 2006.
Only three shortstops in the history of the game have finished the season with a OPS over 1.000: Alex Rodriguez (4 times), Nomar Garciapara (2 times), and Arky Vaughan (1 time, who also holds the OPS record at 1.098)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flum View PostJust imagine having Miguel and Hanley back to back on this roster. Imagine it. I dare you.
We had two of the best hitters of this generation on the same team... Oh what could have been.
If we kept Miguel, Hammer, and A-Gon, we'd have 4 batters with .950+ OPS.
only 3 times has a team finished with 4 batters with a .950+ OPS
1929 NL Chicago Cubs 4 Rogers Hornsby / Hack Wilson / Kiki Cuyler / Riggs Stephenson
1895 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Sam Thompson / Ed Delahanty / Jack Clements
1894 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Ed Delahanty / Sam Thompson / Tuck Turner
Comment
-
Originally posted by nny View PostFrom the other place:
If we kept Miguel, Hammer, and A-Gon, we'd have 4 batters with .950+ OPS.
only 3 times has a team finished with 4 batters with a .950+ OPS
1929 NL Chicago Cubs 4 Rogers Hornsby / Hack Wilson / Kiki Cuyler / Riggs Stephenson
1895 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Sam Thompson / Ed Delahanty / Jack Clements
1894 NL Philadelphia Phillies 4 Billy Hamilton / Ed Delahanty / Sam Thompson / Tuck Turner
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Godfather View PostFuck A Gon and the .950 OPSesseess. We'd have no 2nd world series with them. I'm happy where we are. Cool stat though...This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fritz View PostAgreed, however, hindsight being 20/20 we should've given up on Jason Stokes instead.Originally posted by Madman81Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
Comment
-
Caught this tweet last night from Jon Heyman:
at marlins game as fan. just for hanley (3 for 3 so far, .365), worth admission price.
Hey, whatever it lacks in poetry it makes up for in clarity.
I knew, in a sort of off-handed way, that Hanley Ramirez is enjoying yet another brilliant season. But after looking at his actual season, I've come to believe that he must be the most underrated player in the major leagues and that probably nobody else is really all that close.
I also "knew" that Albert Pujols is so far ahead of everyone else in the National League that he's basically had the MVP locked up since Memorial Day. I don't get the impression that anyone's even talking about any other candidates. Somebody asks, "Who's the MVP in the National League?" and you say "Why, Albert Pujols of course!" And then it's on to the next burning topic.
Let's got back to this one for a minute, though. According to FanGraphs, there's virtually no difference this season between Pujols, Ramirez, and Chase Utley (which shouldn't be a big surprise, as those three have been among the league's best for three years running).
Granted, you'll get a different answer if you look at different metrics, at least one of which has Pujols way ahead of everyone else ... except for Tim Lincecum, who with a dozen wins in late August isn't anyone's -- well, except Jonah Keri -- idea of an MVP candidate.
Maybe Pujols really is the best player in the National League. He probably is. But there's a .365-hitting shortstop with power, playing for a contending team. Shouldn't we at least take a deep breath and think a few thoughts?
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/sweetspotOriginally posted by Madman81Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
Comment
-
It's rather presumptuous to say we won the world series because of that trade. I hate that that's brought up every time that trade is brought up.
We won the world series with making that trade, we did not win the world series because of that trade
Comment
Comment