like mainge said its like trading a player for cash considerations.. its not cheating. its part of the game.. its not like your just get 5mil for nothing
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CSBC Financials
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Mainge View PostThis is just really awful. Horribly awful. Its been pretty much been proven over and over again why it's not cheating, how it's not unfair, and how there's virtually no difference between that and other forms of trading, but rather it's another option.
Ducks is just doing it to be 'that' guy. He loves the fact that everyone hates him and he can pull the "Everyone hates me, woah is me" card.
Mba I dont understand. She's not stupid.Yeah her attachment to Volstad is perplexing but she knows whats up generally, why keep fighting it. These have been the rules from the get go. Why this? Why not now? What about the contract exceptions? Wouldnt it be cheating to get Albert Pujols for 5m? That would be massively unfair using your vantage point.
If this goes to a vote of some kind, I'm going to be pissed. Because it's going to shot down quicker than a coke whore and it'll be a colossal waste of time.
NNY, the reason why the 5 Million thing isn't unfair is that it was used to put you under the cap if you needed it. Not only that, but it pisses off the players you do that to, making it impossible to resign them. Look at soriano and matthews in my case. Both are so pissed, you'd swear they were owners in this league.
The contract out clause isn't a advantage as your saying, it's a disadvantage.
Comment
-
I already said that I don't need cap room. I still have $16 million which actually went down from the $32 million I used to have before I used the major league contracts.
The actual trading of money I didn't have a problem with until I learned that it would allows teams to go over the cap. That is what I have a problem with. You can get a good player with that extra $5 million. I just checked my roster and I have some good players but only 5 of them make more that $5 million. It still allows for a team to be better than the others.
It's one thing with saying that anyone can do it while just 1 person has but what would the talent level on the field look like if 11 teams used it? It's the difference in talent on the field that I have a problem with. The whole point of having a salary cap is to prevent teams from being better than other teams that don't either have or want to spend the money but we are throwing the whole design of the cap out the window if we allow it.Last edited by THE_REAL_MIBS; 11-01-2009, 09:57 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nny View PostFor a response of why you are wrong, read the other 100 posts in this thread
--------------------
Originally posted by MiamiHomer View PostI don't love you.
You aren't stupid enough to believe I'd turn down that Grade A piece of ass are you sweety.
Beside, your old and used up anyway. I tore you up baby.
Just move on baby, you were only a bed to me anyway.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mbaamin08 View PostI already said that I don't need cap room. I still have $16 million which actually went down from the $32 million I used to have before I used the major league contracts.
The actual trading of money I didn't have a problem with until I learned that it would allows teams to go over the cap. That is what I have a problem with. You can get a good player with that extra $5 million. I just checked my roster and I have some good players but only 5 of them make more that $5 million. It still allows for a team to be better than the others.
It's one thing with saying that anyone can do it while just 1 person has but what would the talent level on the field look like if 11 teams used it? It's the difference in talent on the field that I have a problem with. The whole point of having a salary cap is to prevent teams from being better than other teams that don't either have or want to spend the money but we are throwing the whole design of the cap out the window if we allow it.
In a few seasons from now, Nny's farm is going to be more stacked than Sean Wests' cab driver. A few more years after that, his team is going to be a cost controlled rape machine that will dominate until its too expensive to keep. Bobbob likes the proven commodity, so he's more likely to give up a spec or two to keep a more expensive core together. Eventually he'll run out of specs and his players will get older and he'll have to rebuild. It'll be more difficult for him because he's gave up the future for 6% more space. Six fucking percent. It's less than you pay for sales tax for fucks sake.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mbaamin08 View PostI already said that I don't need cap room. I still have $16 million which actually went down from the $32 million I used to have before I used the major league contracts.
The actual trading of money I didn't have a problem with until I learned that it would allows teams to go over the cap. That is what I have a problem with. You can get a good player with that extra $5 million. I just checked my roster and I have some good players but only 5 of them make more that $5 million. It still allows for a team to be better than the others.
It's one thing with saying that anyone can do it while just 1 person has but what would the talent level on the field look like if 11 teams used it? It's the difference in talent on the field that I have a problem with. The whole point of having a salary cap is to prevent teams from being better than other teams that don't either have or want to spend the money but we are throwing the whole design of the cap out the window if we allow it.
Comment
-
How did I miss this train wreck?
I really don't understand the problem here. Let's see, the "problems" voiced:
(1) A team can horde cash considerations
reality:nope, it's only a $5 million +/- threshold. No team can sell off excess cap space nor can a team go for broke with a $100 million payroll
(2) What's to stop a team from continually operating at $80 million, they can always operate at $80 million!
reality Well, sure, just like any team can trade for the top pitcher at the deadline, but eventually your organizational resources get consumed. Maybe someone has enough players to make a move time and time and time again for the cash considerations, but I'll bet against it being good for the long term outlook as well as the short term outlook
(3) Owners can collude to send each other their cap space!
reality Owners could collude to send each other their best players too, this is just absurd to voice as a concern. The problem here doesn't derive from the cash exemption, the problem here derives from lack of trust. Ask yourself a simple question: 'do you trust _______ to get the best deal possible for his best player?' If the answer was 'yes' before you found out about the exemption, then seriously, stop nagging. Crimson Cane and I talk a lot, I can promise you I'm not going to give him a cut-rate deal on any cap space, nor Scott Kazmir
Comment
Comment