Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Commissioner to Look at Ways to Improve Game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Commissioner to Look at Ways to Improve Game

    By Barry M. Bloom / MLB.com

    12/15/09 1:53 PM EST

    NEW YORK -- Commissioner Bud Selig announced on Tuesday that he will chair a new 14-man special committee to analyze ways of improving Major League Baseball on the field.

    The committee includes four managers, four former and present general managers, four owner representatives, MLB consultant and Hall of Famer Frank Robinson, plus renowned columnist George Will.

    "There will be no sacred cows," Selig said on a conference call. "We're open to talk about anything. I've had this in mind for a long time. This is a very blunt group. I want to sit there and listen. If there's anything we can do to improve this game I want to hear about it and discuss it. I will be guided by what this committee comes up with. I have that much respect for this group."

    The group will take up such subjects as pace of game, umpiring, further extension of the use of instant replay and various rule changes, among others. It will meet for the first time during the first quarterly owners' meetings of the new year in the Phoenix area scheduled for Jan. 13-14. The 30 active GMs have also been invited to sit in on those meetings for the first time.

    "The four of us are particularly excited to be part of this committee," said Cardinals manager Tony La Russa, who will be joined from the managerial ranks by the Tigers' Jim Leyland, the Dodgers' Joe Torre and the Angels' Mike Scioscia. "We welcome the opportunity to talk to [the Commissioner] about some of these issues. We especially like the no sacred cows part of it."

    From the GM ranks is Braves executive John Schuerholz, Andy MacPhail of the Orioles, former Twins GM Terry Ryan and Mark Shapiro of the Indians.

    Among the owner representatives is Chuck Armstrong of the Mariners, Paul Beeston of the Blue Jays, Bill DeWitt of the Cardinals and Dave Montgomery of the Phillies.

    "This is an extraordinary committee," said Selig, who said there was no particular timeline for implementing any of its recommendations.

    Schuerholz, now president of the Braves after a long term as GM, said he'd like to tackle the issue of standardizing the designated hitter in both leagues, one way or the other.

    "It's the issue that's been around the longest and has been the most profound topic," said Schuerholz, who also had a successful tour as GM of the Royals. "It's a great topic of conversation for the fans: Whether both leagues should use the DH or not seems to bubble up from time-to-time. When I was in the American League I was in favor of it and since I've been over in the National League I may have taken a different position on it.

    "But I've come to the conclusion that the DH can flourish by using it in its different ways."

    Another topic of immediate concern will be the Commissioner's recent pledge that he intends to compress the postseason schedule prior to the advent of the playoffs next October. Scioscia complained about the numerous off days during this past postseason and has already had a long telephone conversation with Selig about it.

    "I don't know how it's going to be addressed, but I know I want to hear from [the committee] and it's one of the things we're going to talk about," Selig said. "It's up to me once we decide what we want to do. I'll listen to the recommendation this group makes and take it from there."

    With Selig having said he expects to retire at 78 when his current contract expires after the 2012 season, the on-field changes recommended by this committee may be the last of his term as Commissioner.

    "I'm really looking forward to this group doing some things that are most meaningful," he said. "A year or two from now we'll look back and realize how important this was."

    Barry M. Bloom is a national reporter for MLB.com. This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs.
    http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?...=.jsp&c_id=mlb

    Standardizing the DH either way will be horrible. Most people like the difference and it adds to the eccentricities of the league.

    Some things I would do to improve the pace of game:

    -Limit throw-overs (more steals will add drama to late inning games)
    -Stop granting so much time to everyone
    -Enlarge the strikezone-- it's time.

  • #2
    Bring back schedule parity.

    Oh, and I think this will be much ado about nothing. You aren't going to get very progressive ideas from a group of people who have been in the game that long.
    Last edited by CrimsonCane; 12-15-2009, 07:49 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      DH for both leagues. Offense makes the league popular.
      This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by CrimsonCane View Post
        Bring back schedule parity.
        I think money will be the only sacred cow in this committee. I'd be for it, but it is as likely as going back to a East/West format.
        --------------------
        Originally posted by Fritz View Post
        DH for both leagues. Offense makes the league popular.
        Last edited by Party; 12-15-2009, 07:50 PM. Reason: Doublepost Merged

        Comment


        • #5
          Salary Cap.
          This is a Dolphins town, though.

          "Fuck, what've they done?'' --Ozzie Guillen

          I am dead set against free agency, it can ruin baseball. --- George Steinbrenner

          2010 SoFlaMarlins Fantasy Baseball Champion
          Edmonton Ice Bats
          2007 Teal League Wildcard
          2008 Teal League Wildcard

          2009 Teal League Wildcard
          2010 Teal League Wildcard
          2011 Teal League West Division Winner

          Comment


          • #6
            I agree that this will be too much of the 'good ol' boys network' to actually make, or even propose, any changes.

            Also, I'd imagine that all NL owners would need to be in agreement to impose a league-wide DH.

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't know, this is Selig we're talking about. This is the same guy who pushed for the WBC, Wild Card, interleague play, tying WSHVA to the ASG and almost eliminated the AL/NL format for an Eastern/Western League format.

              I would be surprised if in-game changes aren't made. His tenure has been marked by drastic changes and some of the pace of games stuff is not something the owners or fans will riot about. Some of these proposed changes have been floating around for years and he is finally is taking the initiative.
              Last edited by Party; 12-15-2009, 08:31 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Getting rid of the World Series implications for the All-Star Game would be nice.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I agree with everything Festa said in his first post and CC's last post.

                  Limiting throw overs is a fantastic idea. Was that your own Festa? Having a DH in the NL would be the worst thing they could do to baseball. I'm a traditionalist so I'm not craving too much change but the pace of the game, the post season schedule and the implications of the All Star game all need immediate attention.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Nah, limiting throw overs has been discussed for years. Bill James proposed two per inning in his Historical Abstract IIRC. I'm not ready to go that extreme. I think one per runner per base is good enough.
                    Last edited by Party; 12-15-2009, 10:50 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Limiting throws over to bases would probably make the games about 30 minutes shorter. That would be freaking fantastic.
                      This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        How will that affect the game though? I'm not really crazy about that idea. In the eyes of the runner, they can take a huge lead once they've made that one throw-over.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Moar offense = good for the game
                          This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yea, I express Matt Wilson's skeptcisim, but if Bill James recommended it I'm sure he thought through that obvious issue. I'd be curious to know how that would be resolved.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I just don't know how you practically resolve that, outside of making it a subjective call for umpires to make (which is probably not en vogue considering the shit heaping umps have taken lately).

                              Can you throw over past your limit if the runner takes a huge lead? If so, how big is huge? Can he go halfway to second? If not that, do you limit the lead that runners can take? I don't like the idea of putting those kind of restrictions on play, and I don't really see any other way to institute a throw-over limit.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X