If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Those plays are different. In the one on the left he doesn't move in front of the plate (front in this case being where the third base line would ultimately meet the plate) until he has the ball and on the right he is there before he gets it. It's just how the rule describes them. It's pretty freakin dumb, but based on the rule, I think that's correct (one out, one safe)
Those plays are different. In the one on the left he doesn't move in front of the plate (front in this case being where the third base line would ultimately meet the plate) until he has the ball and on the right he is there before he gets it. It's just how the rule describes them. It's pretty freakin dumb, but based on the rule, I think that's correct (one out, one safe)
The vine doesn't show it but Mathis was lined up behind the plate until the ball was thrown and then he had to move to get the ball (a move allowed under the current rule).
I actually see a difference between both plays, but how is Mathis supposed to catch the ball without "blocking the plate?" Is he supposed to just let the ball go?
Listen I understand what they want Mathis to do on that play, move into fair ground to catch the ball and then get back and make a tag.
The problem is, Mathis was not in the spot to even block the plate. I don't think most people understand how hard it is to catch a short-hop in a catchers mitt. He got into a spot that gave him the best shot to field that throw. If you're not going to allow the catcher to get into the best position for them to field a throw with a runner baring down him than the game is broken.
Comment