Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Neyer: Coghlan's Big Second Half

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Neyer: Coghlan's Big Second Half

    A little-noticed nugget, courtesy of Elias:

    Chris Coghlan capped his torrid second half with three hits on Sunday and he finished the season with 113 hits after the All-Star break. That's a National League record for most post-break hits in one season by a rookie and it's the highest total by a freshman since Boston's Dave Stapleton collected 120 hits after the break in 1980.

    Before I launch into the inevitable sniping, let me say this: the Marlins deserve a great deal of credit for sticking with Coghlan. Despite having played only 25 games in Triple-A, Coghlan joined the Marlins in early May. In his first 25 games with the big club, he put up a .205/.337/.282 line. As you can tell, he drew plenty of walks but did almost nothing else.

    The Marlins kept playing him, though, and from June 6 through the end of the season Coghlan batted .343/.400/.493. Not bad for a guy who's got a .298 career average in the minors. OK, now for the sniping ...

    From Baseball America's preseason report:

    Predominantly a third baseman in college, he has made himself into a solid second baseman. His baseball smarts and work ethic bode well for him. Coghlan's hands aren't the softest, and he remains a work in progress around the bag at second. He probably won't hit for much power, though he does tend to find the gaps. It was a surprise when the Marlins acquired slick-fielding second baseman Emilio Bonifacio from the Nationals in November. Coghlan is a superior hitter and could bounce back to third base if needed, but his fast track to the majors as Dan Uggla's eventual replacement has gained a potential roadblock.

    The real surprise came when the Marlins shifted the light-hitting Bonifacio to third base ... and just kept playing him there, game after game after game. Among the 76 National Leaguers who played enough to qualify for the batting title, Bonifacio might have been the worst. He finished with the lowest OPS in the league and wasn't much of a third baseman, either. Meanwhile, the Marlins shifted Coghlan to left field -- where he was just awful -- and left Cameron Maybin, an outstanding outfielder, in the minors for most of the season. Was the Marlins' solution to this puzzle really the best they could do?

    They finished five games behind the Rockies in the wild card standings, and were pretty lucky to get that close. But the last week of the season could have been more exciting than it was, for the few Floridians who hadn't shifted their attentions to the football.

    Is Coghlan the new Stapleton? The Marlins have to hope not. Stapleton (most famous for not playing in this game) played regularly for a few seasons as a super-utility infielder, but suffered a serious knee injury in 1984 and wound up on the end of the bench in each of the next two seasons. He went to spring training with the Mariners in 1987, but was released and never played again.

    There's really no reason to think that Coghlan's career will follow a similar path. Oh, he could become a super-utility player. We know he can play second base and third base, and of course left field (if poorly). But Coghlan's two years younger than Stapleton was as a rookie. And Coghlan's already had a better season than Stapleton ever did.

    So, no: He's probably not the new Dave Stapleton. But this winter the Marlins need to decide what he will be. Because he probably shouldn't again be an every-day left fielder.
    http://myespn.go.com/blogs/sweetspot
    Originally posted by Madman81
    Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
    Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM me!

  • #2
    Knowing us, we'll move him to catcher and have him as our closer on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Sundays.
    This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm not sure there was a point to that article, and if there was, it had nothing to with Coghlan.

      Comment


      • #4
        so he started about coghlan, bitched about bonerface and made some dumbass comments about the marlins being in the race.

        Was there a point to this idiotic nonsense?

        Comment


        • #5
          When a player leads all major leaguers in hits post whenever that clock is (I think July 15) and leads all rookies in average, you have to wonder what the fuck the guy is thinking if he has to ask "is he a utility player."

          You fucking idiot Rob Neyer, go suck David Wright's dick some more.
          Last edited by Swifty; 10-05-2009, 06:46 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Wright .307/.390/.447 (.837)
            Coghlan .321/.390/.460 (.850)

            Fuck the Mets.

            Comment


            • #7
              Did anyone read it?

              The reason he asks that rhetorical question was because of the last rookie guy Stapleton, who became a super utility guy.
              poop

              Comment


              • #8
                It's so insultingly non-sequitor, I wouldn't encourage anyone to read it.

                He makes no point, becomes overly tangential and concludes with the most bizarre comparison possible.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't agree with that. It's certainly possible the team might start jerking Coghlan around the field to fill whatever whole he can in the next few years. I don't think it's out of the question.

                  I think you are taking "Super utility" to be a comment on his skills and abilities. I don't think that is what it is. Chone Figgins has been a pretty decent player and he can be described a super utility player. Bill Hall could have been described that way.

                  And he actually says he doesn't expect him to be a super utility player:

                  There's really no reason to think that Coghlan's career will follow a similar path. Oh, he could become a super-utility player. We know he can play second base and third base, and of course left field (if poorly). But Coghlan's two years younger than Stapleton was as a rookie. And Coghlan's already had a better season than Stapleton ever did.

                  So, no: He's probably not the new Dave Stapleton. But this winter the Marlins need to decide what he will be. Because he probably shouldn't again be an every-day left fielder.
                  I don't see how he makes no point, and I don't see how he concludes with a bizarre comparison. He concludes by saying that we need to figure out what he is and not let him wander around the field for a few years.
                  poop

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I did not read it

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I took Swift's advice and didn't read it either.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I didn't read it first

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X