Trade: Mish: Marcell Ozuna Traded to St. Louis Cardinals

[MiamiHomer]

[tweet]941004846035034113[/tweet]

[fish16]

Mish: Marcell Ozuna Traded to St. Louis Cardinals

Craig MishVerified account
@CraigMish
56s56 seconds ago
More
Ozuna to Cardinals is done

LETS GO!

[tjfla]

LETS GO!

Lets see what they got

[fish16]

And now we sit back and pray that Alcantara isnt the best prospect we get in the deal.

[MiamiHomer]

[tweet]941006037712240640[/tweet]

[fish16]

lets hope we can get quicker details of what we got this time than with stanton. id assume we will get info soon. Wonder if Ziegler is involved too.

- - - - - - - - - -

Jesse SanchezVerified account
@JesseSanchezMLB
3m3 minutes ago
More
Source: Marcel Ozuna has been traded to the Cardinals. The deal is pending a physical.

More confirmation. So this is the real deal.

[dim]

LETS GO!

You are way too excited for a fan of the team getting rid of everybody

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[fish16]

You are way too excited for a fan of the team getting rid of everybody

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

getting rid of everybody from a team with an expected payroll of $140 million and hasnt been over .500 since 2009?

[Nick]

Dark days folks. When you can't find a way to make your 27-year old superstar, who is relatively affordable at this point, a part of your future plans, you're not a real major league franchise.

- - - - - - - - - -

getting rid of everybody from a team with an expected payroll of $140 million and hasnt been over .500 since 2009?

$140 million is a middle of the pack payroll in the major leagues.

[fish16]

Dark days folks. When you can't find a way to make your 27-year old superstar, who is relatively affordable at this point, a part of your future plans, you're not a real major league franchise.

a part of our future plans? we're rebuilding and he's a free agent in 2 years with scott boras as his agent. Also, his past year was by far the best year he's ever had and it came hitting right behind a historic year from stanton. They are selling high on a guy they wont be able to retain in 2 years and they wont be anywhere near contention in the next 2 years anyway. This is beyond smart business. I dont even know if smart is the right word. More like obvious.

[tjfla]

Dark days folks. When you can't find a way to make your 27-year old superstar, who is relatively affordable at this point, a part of your future plans, you're not a real major league franchise.

- - - - - - - - - -



$140 million is a middle of the pack payroll in the major leagues.

Affordable for 2 years when Scott Boras wants 7/250 million. Its called a rebuild and it has begun

[Nick]

a part of our future plans? we're rebuilding and he's a free agent in 2 years with scott boras as his agent. Also, his past year was by far the best year he's ever had and it came hitting right behind a historic year from stanton. They are selling high on a guy they wont be able to retain in 2 years and they wont be anywhere near contention in the next 2 years anyway. This is beyond smart business. I dont even know if smart is the right word. More like obvious.

Thanks for proving my point for me pal.

Scott Boras is an agent for a lot of players. Every other team deals with him, but it's out of the question for us? Not a real major league franchise.

[fish16]

Dark days folks. When you can't find a way to make your 27-year old superstar, who is relatively affordable at this point, a part of your future plans, you're not a real major league franchise.

- - - - - - - - - -



$140 million is a middle of the pack payroll in the major leagues.

I understand $140 million is middle of the pack, but $140 million and we are nowhere near contention is pointless, not to mention driving us to contention by signing 2 top of the rotation arms would put us closer to $170-180 million. These moves are moving us towards being a sustainable contender year in and year out if this rebuild is done properly.

[MiamiHomer]

[tweet]941010239880560640[/tweet]

[fish16]

Thanks for proving my point for me pal.

Scott Boras is an agent for a lot of players. Every other team deals with him, but it's out of the question for us? Not a real major league franchise.

Scott Boras being his agent means that he will 100% be going to free agency, not that we shouldnt deal with him. Also, you seem to ignore the part where Ozuna put up a career year unlike anything he's previously shown before. This is the definition of selling high. Would you rather he be on a losing team for the next 2 years only to see him leave in free agency n 2 years for a massive deal and see us get nothing?