Well, yeah, cause Loriaz.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Marlins Trade Heaney, Hernandez, Barnes, Hatcher to Dodgers for Gordon, Haren, Rojas
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Namaste View PostI don't hate this deal nearly as much as many do.
There is whining when we trade MLB ready talent for prospects.
Today we got MLB ready talent for prospects.
If they add one more bat, we start the season with a reasonable expectation to grab one of the wild card spots.
Comment
-
Jeff Passan @JeffPassan · 1h 1 hour ago
Another evaluator prefers the Marlins' haul, saying Dee Gordon is a + 2B who steals bases while players going to Dodgers quantity > quality.
Jeff Passan @JeffPassan · 1h 1 hour ago
Andrew Heaney in particular is a polarizing player. Marlins were down on him, and some don't see him as much more than a back-end starter.
--------------------
Hatcher got traded while on that military tour, so that's kinda awkward and hilarious.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thatnewguy View PostIt's not the fact they traded for money, it's the appearance that the reason they made this trade over any other potential trades, the reason they got Haren in return, and the reason they gave up as much as they did, is because of the money they were getting was better here than in other situations. Couple that with the already notorious reputation of this ownership and you have something that just seems fishy. Granted, it's not a salary dump and Gordon is an upgrade over Solano and Dietrich but it just seems as if the club settled because the Dodgers were willing to give $12.5 million.
--------------------
Reckless prediction: If Morneau gets traded here, Dietrich goes to Colorado.
--------------------
Originally posted by Miamarlin21 View PostRojas is a GREAT defensive infielder. I saw him for a year or so with the Reds in the minors and was always highly regarded for his glove. He can play all over the infield.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thatnewguy View PostIt's not the fact they traded for money, it's the appearance that the reason they made this trade over any other potential trades, the reason they got Haren in return, and the reason they gave up as much as they did, is because of the money they were getting was better here than in other situations. Couple that with the already notorious reputation of this ownership and you have something that just seems fishy. Granted, it's not a salary dump and Gordon is an upgrade over Solano and Dietrich but it just seems as if the club settled because the Dodgers were willing to give $12.5 million.
--------------------
Reckless prediction: If Morneau gets traded here, Dietrich goes to Colorado.
Comment
-
I think it was more than his numbers. His stuff just isn't impressive. I remember thinking he looked like a soft-tossing long reliever, not a rotation ace. No great pitches. But he's still young, left handed, and big, so he will probably develop into no worse than a decent starter one day. But that's a guy to get rid of now rather than later.STANTON
Serious fun! GET IT IN!
Comment
-
I mean, it all depends on what Heaney becomes. It appears bad because you gave up your biggest piece for a slap hitter who can't get on base. But, at the same time, you may have just traded a bottom-line starter and couple of guys for a cheap, all-star core piece. I mean, if he ends up being the player he was in the first half, then we win this trade regardless of what we gave up. Obviously it's about both 2015 and beyond and so this may be a guy who helps this club win next season and in future seasons. He may also be a shitty hitter and the reason why we're out of "depth" in the starting rotation.
Who knows? If Dee Gordon can just get on base more than he'll be good. He'll hit his triples and he'll steal his bases. I like him. I just don't know if he'll be any better than what he was this past year.
--------------------
Originally posted by HUGG View Posthas anyone made a lazy joke about going to Miami to retire yet? I don't feel like re-reading the whole thread
Comment
Comment