BGF, I have been thinking about this a lot lately as well. The only issue I can find is that there isn't a great matchup. The Marlins need a first baseman and to be honest there are not really any elite first base prospects. There's C.J. Cron of the Angels, Dan Vogelbach of the Cubs, Matthew Olson from the A's and Kyle Parker from the Rockies. I don't think any of those guys are gonna be great. The Marlins could get creative and move a third baseman or an outfielder to first (Joey Gallo from Texas would be nice)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did the Marlins Win Their First Road Game on 4/22? Does a Bear Shit in the Woods?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lou View PostOffer him a 6 year contract with an option. Tick tock.
--------------------
Originally posted by BigGameFish View PostWe already have a top prospect at third, a SS with a good glove and hitting well now...I think we have options at second with Dietrich...Salty is on a deal long enough where getting a catching prospect would be a waste of Cishek's value...so maybe first base or a top Ace-quality starter? Our outfield is stacked both on the club and in the minors.
Comment
-
SS is a huge need. Hechavarria still cant hit.
Dietrich, with his ability to play all 4 infield spots and likely at least LF(not well at any of them, probably, but in a pinch) and pop in his bat would make him a very good super utility guy IMO.Amy Adams, AKA Cinnamon MuffLogan Morrison: "If baseball didn't exist, I would probably be ... like a curler. Or a hairstylist."
Jupiter
39 AB
15 H
0 2B
0 3B
0 HR
0 BB
.385/.385/.385
Comment
-
Originally posted by Todd View PostSS is a huge need. Hechavarria still cant hit.
Dietrich, with his ability to play all 4 infield spots and likely at least LF(not well at any of them, probably, but in a pinch) and pop in his bat would make him a very good super utility guy IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lou View PostOffer him a 6 year contract with an option. Tick tock.
--------------------
And you can't really compare Cishek to Urbina trade when Urbina was over a decade ago and the consensus was we vastly overpaid at the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Erick View PostIf it's based on that, you could probably say that for a bunch of infielders. I don't see how a guy can be considered a "very good super utility guy" when he sucks defensively at every position.
There's not really any difference in value between an all-glove, no-bat utility player and the opposite.Last edited by Bobbob1313; 04-23-2014, 07:45 PM.poop
Comment
Comment