If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don't know, I'm thinking if they're looking to deal him at the deadline he should still be in the rotation. His numbers still aren't that bad, despite his struggles. Some team is bound to give us something decent for him with the little starting pitching available at the deadline.
maybe not, but it certainly justifies removing him from the rotation when you have 6 starting pitchers
he's not as bad as he's pitched lately and he's nowhere near as good as he pitched the first few starts. and past performance would indicate he's closer to what he's doing now than then
if we're gonna get something for him, we're still gonna get it with him in his current role
Oh I agree he's somewhere in the middle. A 4.50 ERA type pitcher, that's why I'm saying that despite his struggles, his value probably won't get higher than it is right now. The role playoff teams would use him in is probably what we're using him in now, so I see your point. All I'm saying is by sticking him in this long-relief role I think we're keeping him off the radar to teams. He could go 2 weeks without pitching like he did before his appearance a couple days ago. You have him starting, maybe some team likes him as a fifth starter and offers something more. It's not like Tom Koehler's in our future plans beyond the role Slowey is filling now.
Yeah, that's my thing about it is that I'm not really a fan of Koehler really becoming anything so I'd rather Slowey be getting starts as trade bait/see if he's worth keeping next year.
But I also think it really doesn't matter so whatever
Comment