The SNY pregame show yesterday featured an interview with Fredi Gonzalez which produced several interesting things; some of which had to do with the fact that he's playing the "we're just happy to be here" card, but that's neither here nor there.
What he did say that was of spectacular interest to me was regarding JJ's most recent start against the Mets, and, paraphrasing, were this May or June, they would have definitely ran him out there trying to get 8 innings out of him.
Now, this is the most concrete thing I've heard regarding the team making a conscientious effort to limit JJ's innings, but here's the thing...do we really need to?
Johnson's first full season was also, to this point, his only full season. He recorded 157 innings in 31 appearances (27 starts 5 innings per appearance).
Johnson's currently appeared in 26 games (all starts) with 171.2 innings (6.1 innings per start). Just based on keeping him on regular rest, he'll have 7 more starts in the regular season. Assuming we keep him on the schedule he is now, he won't start a game against the Phillies, but he's eligible to start the last day of the season on short rest. I point this out because we've indicated that even against Philadelphia, we'll pull him early to keep his innings down.
Thus, 7 appearances at his current 6.1 innings per start pace gives him 44.1 innings more this season. That'll push him through the 200 innings plateau (216 innings), making the first time in his career he'll pitch 200+ innings in a season.
Is this concerning? Well, superficially, yes, it is. You're going to ask a guy with serious injuries to log 200 innings when, in years 2006-08 he didn't pitch 200 innings combined. However, upon deeper inspection, if he ends around 215 innings, his innings might not even be a concern. For Tommy John recoverers, the rule of thumb is that their first full season back shouldn't exceed the innings total of their last full season by more than 60 innings. Conveniently, JJ's 2006 total of 157 puts his 2009 danger threshold at 210 or thereabouts.
Additionally, JJ's not exactly a max effort pitcher, you can see that he'll dial it up to 98 when he has to, but other than that, his delivery is smooth and effortless. He doesn't have a power-curve or a splitter, so there isn't a ton of pressure on his elbow. He doesn't even change his arm slot for the slider, he just lets it go. I'd argue that the most taxing pitch he throws is his changeup because he uses a slightly different arm action from his fastball/slider.
So then, if his pitches don't tax his arm, he's not kicking his own ass start to start, do we need to worry about the innings at all? Should the concern then be on the pitch count? Or is this a chicken - egg conundrum where we can't have a high pitch count without innings, therefore, limiting the innings will surely limit the pitch count?
Ultimately, my personal preference would be to not worry about the innings, but how the innings are accomplished. 90 pitches over 7 innings, with JJ, do not worry me nearly as much as 50 over 3. I certainly hope, as an organization, we feel the same way.
What he did say that was of spectacular interest to me was regarding JJ's most recent start against the Mets, and, paraphrasing, were this May or June, they would have definitely ran him out there trying to get 8 innings out of him.
Now, this is the most concrete thing I've heard regarding the team making a conscientious effort to limit JJ's innings, but here's the thing...do we really need to?
Johnson's first full season was also, to this point, his only full season. He recorded 157 innings in 31 appearances (27 starts 5 innings per appearance).
Johnson's currently appeared in 26 games (all starts) with 171.2 innings (6.1 innings per start). Just based on keeping him on regular rest, he'll have 7 more starts in the regular season. Assuming we keep him on the schedule he is now, he won't start a game against the Phillies, but he's eligible to start the last day of the season on short rest. I point this out because we've indicated that even against Philadelphia, we'll pull him early to keep his innings down.
Thus, 7 appearances at his current 6.1 innings per start pace gives him 44.1 innings more this season. That'll push him through the 200 innings plateau (216 innings), making the first time in his career he'll pitch 200+ innings in a season.
Is this concerning? Well, superficially, yes, it is. You're going to ask a guy with serious injuries to log 200 innings when, in years 2006-08 he didn't pitch 200 innings combined. However, upon deeper inspection, if he ends around 215 innings, his innings might not even be a concern. For Tommy John recoverers, the rule of thumb is that their first full season back shouldn't exceed the innings total of their last full season by more than 60 innings. Conveniently, JJ's 2006 total of 157 puts his 2009 danger threshold at 210 or thereabouts.
Additionally, JJ's not exactly a max effort pitcher, you can see that he'll dial it up to 98 when he has to, but other than that, his delivery is smooth and effortless. He doesn't have a power-curve or a splitter, so there isn't a ton of pressure on his elbow. He doesn't even change his arm slot for the slider, he just lets it go. I'd argue that the most taxing pitch he throws is his changeup because he uses a slightly different arm action from his fastball/slider.
So then, if his pitches don't tax his arm, he's not kicking his own ass start to start, do we need to worry about the innings at all? Should the concern then be on the pitch count? Or is this a chicken - egg conundrum where we can't have a high pitch count without innings, therefore, limiting the innings will surely limit the pitch count?
Ultimately, my personal preference would be to not worry about the innings, but how the innings are accomplished. 90 pitches over 7 innings, with JJ, do not worry me nearly as much as 50 over 3. I certainly hope, as an organization, we feel the same way.
Comment