......back in my day......the Angels played in the PCL....something about abortions
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stark: Marlins Could Be Big Players This Off-Season UPDATE: All Big Names In Play
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Big Z View PostWhat the hell would we trade for Votto?
I still don't think that gets it done. We don't have a premium pitching piece to move that someone else could offer. Gotta imagine one of the Giants starters is on the table and that immediately trumps anything but Hanley or Stanton in an offer.
But, I am not against the idea of trading all of Morrison, Dominguez, James, and Coghlan for young pitching, signing replacements at 3B and LF (Aramis, Beltran) to 2 year deals, and bringing in Ozzie/Buerhle. Kind of makes sense.
Comment
-
Just to type it out, if that $100 million figure is real, that means the Marlins legitimately have $40 million to spend in free agency:
C John Buck $6,500,000
1B Gaby Sanchez $430,000
2B Emilio Bonifacio $2,000,000 (rough projection)
3B Matt Dominguez $410,000
SS Hanley Ramirez $15,000,000
LF Logan Morrison $420,000
RF Mike Stanton $420,000
CF
B Brett Hayes $420,000
B Bryan Petersen $420,000
B Chris Coghlan $600,000
B
B
SP Josh Johnson $13,750,000
SP Ricky Nolasco $9,000,000
SP Anibal Sanchez $8,000,000 (rough projection)
SP
SP
RP Edward Mujica $1,500,000 (rough projection)
RP Randy Choate $1,500,000
RP Ryan Webb $430,000
RP Mike Dunn $420,000
RP Steve Cishek $420,000
RP
RP
$61,640,000
Only organization no shows - Chris Volstad ($2.5ish), Leo/Juan Nunez/Oviedo ($6.5)
A lot of options. It'll be interesting to see what they do.
Comment
-
Based on those numbers and that roster I imagine they resign Infante, sign Wilson, sign Ramirez, and some lower tier SP, then spend a few million on the bench. Boner can either play CF or be the super sub with Coghlan in CF. Trotting out a (hopefully) better Hanley, more consistent Gaby, older Stanton and LoMo and adding Aramis I think we can get away with Coghlan and Boner in the lineup.
I still don't buy the $100 million figure though.Originally posted by Madman81Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
Comment
-
I highly highly doubt he was just being a nice guy. I think he told teams no because we thought we were still in it. And we have no closer for next year.Originally posted by Madman81Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bobbob1313 View PostIf we have $40 million to spend, I'd try really hard to add Beurhle, Wilson, and Ramirez. That pretty much gets you there.
That seems like the Marlins thing to do. Spend big money on 1-2 year deals with Aramis and Beltran, so they get name value and guys coming off monster years, but keep the books clean for impending Johnson and Hanley free agency in 2-3 years, and Stanton/Gaby/others arbitration bumps. Give the longterm deal to a lefty starter, because that's just a huge hole.
Buerhle, Aramis, and Beltran are probably $12 a pop, throw in a couple more for Infante and a bench bat, and skimp entirely on the bullpen (which isn't a bad idea), and that's a pretty good team both right now, and fiscally in the future with no outrageous surprises 4-5 years down the road like that Uggla contract.
Comment
-
Lou, why would Aramis or Beltran sign 1 or 2 year deals? It isn't like they need a bounce back year and they're at the age where this is the last chance they probably have to get a multi year (4+) year deal, no?Originally posted by Madman81Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
Comment
Comment