Originally posted by Mainge
View Post
For nearly every player in the game, we tend to use stats to determine just how good a guy is. They're not perfect, but it's probably the best thing we have.
Why is it stupid to say that Stanton is very good in RF when it can be statistically supported?
And just because Coghlan is improving doesn't mean that he's not been below average. It's hard to not improve from his first year when he was basically horrible. Not to mention that it's questionable whether his bat can consistently play in the big leagues right now, anyway.
Comment