Tweet
thoughts about the general outcome and not the projections themselves?
Was originally stuck because the problem with FIP is that it assumes a pitcher is ML quality (aka .300 BABIP), so income tRA where I can say "that guy aint gonna have a .300 BABIP".
My original thought was that it undervalued SP and overvalued hitters.
However, roughly 30% hitters and 30% SP are > 2 wins
roughly 60% of the hitters and 40% of the SP are between 0 and 2.
So I think it's pretty fair up.
The system just really doesn't like RPs though
Not only that but those WARs for RP is overrating them because I can't find out how to calculate it for RP. For instance, Blaine Boyer's 2008 was very similiar to Tucker (Boyer had a 4.20 FIP and 72 IP), but Boyer had a WAR of 0.2. Really really pisses me off when people just can't post formulas. Is it really that hard? Christ. "here's a bunch of words that don't matter that make me sound smart" fuck off just post the god damn formula.
But, I mean, is a 4.2 ERA RP really all that valueable?
--------------------
ok wow the forum shrunk those to the point you can't read them
here
hitters for a base point: http://marlins.selftitled.net/images/AAAhitters.PNG
SP: http://marlins.selftitled.net/images/AAAsp.PNG
RP: http://marlins.selftitled.net/images/AAArp.PNG
lets see if it shrinsk these
--------------------
lol tim tucker and ryan wood
WOOPS
--------------------
also this is going under the assumption of 6 IP per start for SP
--------------------
ML average has constantly been about 5.8 so good enough
Was originally stuck because the problem with FIP is that it assumes a pitcher is ML quality (aka .300 BABIP), so income tRA where I can say "that guy aint gonna have a .300 BABIP".
My original thought was that it undervalued SP and overvalued hitters.
However, roughly 30% hitters and 30% SP are > 2 wins
roughly 60% of the hitters and 40% of the SP are between 0 and 2.
So I think it's pretty fair up.
The system just really doesn't like RPs though
Not only that but those WARs for RP is overrating them because I can't find out how to calculate it for RP. For instance, Blaine Boyer's 2008 was very similiar to Tucker (Boyer had a 4.20 FIP and 72 IP), but Boyer had a WAR of 0.2. Really really pisses me off when people just can't post formulas. Is it really that hard? Christ. "here's a bunch of words that don't matter that make me sound smart" fuck off just post the god damn formula.
But, I mean, is a 4.2 ERA RP really all that valueable?
--------------------
ok wow the forum shrunk those to the point you can't read them
here
hitters for a base point: http://marlins.selftitled.net/images/AAAhitters.PNG
SP: http://marlins.selftitled.net/images/AAAsp.PNG
RP: http://marlins.selftitled.net/images/AAArp.PNG
lets see if it shrinsk these
--------------------
lol tim tucker and ryan wood
WOOPS
--------------------
also this is going under the assumption of 6 IP per start for SP
--------------------
ML average has constantly been about 5.8 so good enough