Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nate Eovaldi, SP

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    can deround or brantly play 2nd NO

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by emkayseven View Post
      Good thing we don't have Travis de"Around (injured)
      I love autocorrect.
      This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

      Comment


      • #18
        I did that on purpose fritz. u NO that right?
        Originally posted by Madman81
        Most of the people in the world being dumb is not a requirement for you to be among their ranks.
        Need help? Questions? Concerns? Want to chat? PM me!

        Comment


        • #19
          Got meeeeeeeeeeeeeee
          This post was brought to you by: Dat SEC Speed

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Namaste View Post
            Buck (.732 OPS) isn't as bad as Brantly (.596), though.
            for the money in a 1 on 1 scenario, I'd rather have Brantly right now

            Comment


            • #21
              Things might be differently if we weren't the worst team in baseball.

              For instance, a playoff caliber team would pay for Buck's OPS over Brantly shitting the bed for cheap.

              Comment


              • #22
                I don't buy it

                Unless Buck is that much better defensively than Brantly, right now, most teams would rather Brantly

                Comment


                • #23
                  Brantly is god awful behind the dish.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I thought Buck was making $9mil not $6mil

                    yea, most (if not all) would rather have Buck

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Namaste View Post
                      How we didn't get him in the big trade is just best
                      Didnt want him. Havent you been paying attention.
                      Amy Adams, AKA Cinnamon Muff
                      Logan Morrison: "If baseball didn't exist, I would probably be ... like a curler. Or a hairstylist."
                      Noah Perio
                      Jupiter
                      39 AB
                      15 H
                      0 2B
                      0 3B
                      0 HR
                      0 BB
                      .385/.385/.385

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I don't get why that quote about Amy Adams is under your words.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Its from her Between Two Ferns interview with Zach Galafahowever you spell it
                          Zach G: You have red hair
                          Amy Adams: Yes I do, guess what they used to call me in high school?
                          Zach G: Cinnamon muff?
                          Amy Adams: ......no, they didnt call me cinnamon muff.
                          Last edited by Todd; 06-02-2013, 07:29 PM.
                          Amy Adams, AKA Cinnamon Muff
                          Logan Morrison: "If baseball didn't exist, I would probably be ... like a curler. Or a hairstylist."
                          Noah Perio
                          Jupiter
                          39 AB
                          15 H
                          0 2B
                          0 3B
                          0 HR
                          0 BB
                          .385/.385/.385

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I don't get why it's there

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Hugg View Post
                              that's not surprising at all, Mathis is horrifying

                              on the plus side, we have him under contract for next year too
                              Mathis must do something really well defensively because several organizations seem to like him a lot. Way too much, actually.

                              With the Angels, he seemed to get a whole lot of playing time even though they had Mike Napoli.

                              Toronto actually gave him the multi-year contract and then said he was the guy they didn't want to deal in that trade (had to be a lie).

                              Now with the Marlins, he's actually playing more than Brantly. Brantly kinda sucks, but you'd think a rebuilding team would want to play the 23-year-old catcher they got in a deal for Anibal Sanchez more than Jeff Mathis who's sucked his whole entire career.

                              I don't get what's made so many GM's value him in such a way.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Code:
                                           Jeff Mathis   Teammates
                                               IC  ERA     IC  ERA  DIFF
                                2007   LAA  467.0 3.89  968.0 4.39  0.50
                                2008   LAA  793.1 3.65  658.0 4.40  0.75
                                2009   LAA  657.0 3.99  788.0 4.84  0.85
                                2010   LAA  553.2 3.67  895.2 4.27  0.60
                                2011   LAA  698.0 3.25  767.0 3.86  0.61
                                2012   TOR  532.2 4.39  911.0 4.79  0.40
                                Total      3701.2 3.77 4987.2 4.43  0.66
                                that's gotta be why
                                --------------------
                                This is crazy:

                                Of my 81 selected games, Mathis caught 41 times, Napoli 40 times. Mathis caught 865 pitches that were taken in the strike zone, and Napoli caught 806 pitches that were taken in the strike zone.

                                • Of those 865 pitches, Mathis got a strike call on 645 of them. He also got strike calls on 86 pitches that did not appear to be in the rulebook strike zone.

                                • Of Napoli's 806 pitches, he got the strike call on 591 of them. He also got strike calls on 75 pitches that did not appear to be in the rulebook strike zone.

                                • For every 100 pitches in the strike zone, then, Mathis got 84.5 strikes. For every 100 pitches in the strike zone, Napoli got 82.6 strikes.

                                That's around two pitches per 100 in the zone, or one extra strike call for about four or five games. You'd be tempted to say "only" two pitches per 100, but that's not an insignificant total. If Mathis catches 80 games, that's about 33 extra strikes he earns in a season. Dan Turkenkopf calculated the value of switching a ball to a strike at .161 runs, so 33 extra strikes would be worth about five runs in a season, or about a half a win.
                                http://www.ocregister.com/articles/h...rike-href.html

                                If he could hit at all, he'd be so valuable. But he can't.
                                Last edited by HUGG; 06-02-2013, 10:13 PM. Reason: Doublepost Merged

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X