User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: New Stadium Dimensions Compared to Other Ballparks

  1. #1
    Yes, Next Year

    Party
    has no status.
    Party's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami-Dade

    Posts
    12,919
    Reputation
    2184673

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default New Stadium Dimensions Compared to Other Ballparks

    New Stadium Dimensions


    Dolphin Stadium



    (The Triangle at LSS is really 410ish, not 434)

    Some of the bigger parks in the league...













    Some of the smaller stadiums...










    Some of the older parks in the league...






    Not 100% but it's a good comparison.

    Stadium is going to play like the Grand Canyon when the roof is closed.

    Fans are going to be on top of the action down the lines. Almost no foul territory.
    Last edited by Party; 08-14-2009 at 01:57 AM.

  2. #2
    needs more teal

    Omar
    has no status.
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    2,802
    Reputation
    633765

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Good to see, though I still wish we would have a Teal Tower-like structure in LF to save us as much as the current one has in 17 years.

  3. #3
    Marlin Chic

    Sashimi
    has no status.
    Sashimi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    410
    Reputation
    2477

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm really glad that they kept it a pitcher-friendly park. I'm not a fan of some of the band boxes that have been built recently in a shameless effort to generate more HRs.

    And how cool were the Polo Grounds!

  4. #4
    >:)

    Ralph
    has no status.

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami, FL

    Posts
    2,085
    Reputation
    195228

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Still think it's too pitcher friendly.

  5. #5
    Haters gonna hate.

    Fritz
    has no status.
    Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bobbob's mustache

    Posts
    10,174
    Reputation
    2668981

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wish we could just have a neutral park. Unless you rope it down the lines, it's gonna be hard to hit a dinger.

  6. #6
    Scary Good!

    FishFF
    has no status.
    FishFF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    2,220
    Reputation
    132898

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, we gon be Padres-lite

  7. #7
    Senior Member

    jonathan2323
    has no status.
    jonathan2323's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009

    Posts
    194
    Reputation
    1

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the Stadium dimesions are ridiculous. i like pitcher friendly parks but 420,416 and 396 thats going to be a hard area to hit HRs.

  8. #8
    needs more teal

    Omar
    has no status.
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    2,802
    Reputation
    633765

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sashimi View Post
    I'm really glad that they kept it a pitcher-friendly park. I'm not a fan of some of the band boxes that have been built recently in a shameless effort to generate more HRs.

    And how cool were the Polo Grounds!
    The best. I'd take those dimensions in a heartbeat (with some added distance down the lines, of course.

    Quote Originally Posted by FishFF View Post
    Yeah, we gon be Padres-lite
    We'll be worse, since the humidity weighs the ball down.

  9. #9
    Senior Member

    Bobbob1313
    has no status.
    Bobbob1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    21,853
    Reputation
    3387279

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Whatever. It's neither a positive or a negative. Both teams have to play under the same conditions, it doesn't give anyone an advantage, so I don't really get into that discussion. I'd prefer a nuetral park, but I don't care either way

  10. #10
    Super Moderator

    MiamiHomer
    likes winning.
    MiamiHomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami

    Posts
    24,811
    Reputation
    4526643

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Mike Stanton's power knows no bounds.

  11. #11
    needs more teal

    Omar
    has no status.
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    2,802
    Reputation
    633765

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbob1313 View Post
    Whatever. It's neither a positive or a negative. Both teams have to play under the same conditions, it doesn't give anyone an advantage, so I don't really get into that discussion. I'd prefer a nuetral park, but I don't care either way
    Um, what

  12. #12
    Senior Member

    Bobbob1313
    has no status.
    Bobbob1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    21,853
    Reputation
    3387279

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Both teams have to play in the park, so it doesn't inherently give one team an advantage. Oh, you can build your team to suit the park, but as the past few years have shown, the team you have is more important than what type of park you play in.

    I would personally prefer a neutral park, but i don't really care one way or the other. I'm not going to jump for joy or curse because we are going to play in an absurdly over the top pitchers park.

  13. #13
    needs more teal

    Omar
    has no status.
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    2,802
    Reputation
    633765

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The team you have and the park you play in aren't mutually exclusive, though, at all. Especially when you have 100 games (minimum) booked for pitcher's parks in the division per season.

  14. #14
    Senior Member

    Bobbob1313
    has no status.
    Bobbob1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    21,853
    Reputation
    3387279

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Haven't we booked 100 games (minimum) the past few years in pitchers parks and haven't we still hit home runs and stuff?

    The team you have is far more important than where you play. It's not like this park is only going to help our pitchers.
    --------------------
    Haven't we booked 100 games (minimum) the past few years in pitchers parks and haven't we still hit home runs and stuff?

    The team you have is far more important than where you play. It's not like this park is only going to help our pitchers.
    Last edited by Bobbob1313; 08-14-2009 at 04:44 PM. Reason: Doublepost Merged

  15. #15
    needs more teal

    Omar
    has no status.
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    2,802
    Reputation
    633765

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hasn't Beinfest also said that the mold of this particular team (one sample out of 30) is supposed to be pitching and defense? Our power hitters are either gone (Jacobs), on their way out (Uggla), or the man himself (Hanley time).

  16. #16
    eHe-Cha-Varia

    Namaste
    has no status.

    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    13,903
    Reputation
    4329942

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My .02

    I'd rather our new ballpark be a pitchers park than Citizens type (which is a joke).

    I totally understand how some will be disappointed. I like when HR's are events and not just "ho-hum" there goes another one. Plus, we'll have some really cool triples and some inside the parkers.

  17. #17
    Yes, Next Year

    Party
    has no status.
    Party's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami-Dade

    Posts
    12,919
    Reputation
    2184673

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sub Zero View Post
    The best. I'd take those dimensions in a heartbeat (with some added distance down the lines, of course.


    We'll be worse, since the humidity weighs the ball down.
    Eh, we'll have the roof closed on really humid days. Also SD can get really wet on some nights with the fog. I think it'll be similar to San Diego.

    Roof closed, the Astro Dome is a good comp considering the dimensions are nearly the same.

  18. #18
    Super Moderator

    MiamiHomer
    likes winning.
    MiamiHomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami

    Posts
    24,811
    Reputation
    4526643

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I could have done without the weird triangle in center field but whatever.

  19. #19
    Senior Member

    Bobbob1313
    has no status.
    Bobbob1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    21,853
    Reputation
    3387279

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why is a park that increases home runs considered a joke, but not one that supresses them at a similar rate?

  20. #20
    eHe-Cha-Varia

    Namaste
    has no status.

    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    13,903
    Reputation
    4329942

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbob1313 View Post
    Why is a park that increases home runs considered a joke, but not one that supresses them at a similar rate?


    Because HR's should be hit far and not be routine fly outs?



  21. #21
    Senior Member

    Bobbob1313
    has no status.
    Bobbob1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    21,853
    Reputation
    3387279

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    And what about balls that are hit far and turned into routine outs?

  22. #22
    Yes, Next Year

    Party
    has no status.
    Party's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami-Dade

    Posts
    12,919
    Reputation
    2184673

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Because for the better part of 60 years, stadiums were similar to their modern day home run suppressing counterparts.

    There are very few ballpark between '50 and '89 that were constructed for ML teams that had band box distances.

  23. #23
    eHe-Cha-Varia

    Namaste
    has no status.

    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    13,903
    Reputation
    4329942

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    bob2

    I guess we can go round and round with this but I'm just giving my personal preference.

    Everytime a ball clears the fence in (plug in any small ballpark) that was obviously not well hit, I cringe. Call me a traditionalist.

  24. #24
    Yes, Next Year

    Party
    has no status.
    Party's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami-Dade

    Posts
    12,919
    Reputation
    2184673

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbob1313 View Post
    And what about balls that are hit far and turned into routine outs?
    That has been considered a norm.

    A 315 foot shot in a new ballpark did not make a reappearance in baseball until the 1990s.

  25. #25
    Senior Member

    Bobbob1313
    has no status.
    Bobbob1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Posts
    21,853
    Reputation
    3387279

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Aren't most of those the 'cookie cutters' we always criticize?

    I'm just saying, I'd rather have a neutral than extreme either way, and I don't think there is a natural advantage to one over the other.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •