am i the only one who wants no part of castellanos for the price and length he will inevitably receive? Guy is treated as a superstar bat but he's really not close to that. Good bat but he is not like this star player, especially considering he's ideally a DH. Im happy they arent going that route. he's a low to mid .800s OPS guy to me, not some cant miss sure fire .900 OPS type guy that you can consistently rely on as a star level talent. Im completely ok with not giving him 20 million + with 4+ years. he was great last year but he also played in a good lineup in probably the best hitting ball park in baseball. Needless to say neither of those would be the situation here. He is ideally a 2nd or 3rd best hitter on a great team who can afford to pay that kind of guy as a luxury. I have no problem bowing out on him.
If we're going after a kind of guy like that who is best suited as a DH, id prefer schwarber. But that's dependent on what schwarber's market becomes given the reported crazy interest in him. Regardless, none of these guys we are reportedly interested in are guys that I would give more than 3 years to. Anything more than 3 years for any of these guys and I just hit the trade market and go after a top prospect on the cusp of the big leagues or just starting their career like a Marsh.
If we're going after a kind of guy like that who is best suited as a DH, id prefer schwarber. But that's dependent on what schwarber's market becomes given the reported crazy interest in him. Regardless, none of these guys we are reportedly interested in are guys that I would give more than 3 years to. Anything more than 3 years for any of these guys and I just hit the trade market and go after a top prospect on the cusp of the big leagues or just starting their career like a Marsh.
Comment