View Full Version : Ballpark Outfield Dimensions
Fish Tank Frenzy
11-16-2011, 08:11 PM
I know this has been posted before but I cannot find the dimensions for the outfield walls. Does anyone have a link or know off the top of their heads the dimensions?
MiamiHomer
11-16-2011, 08:12 PM
http://forum.sportsmogul.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=27196&stc=1&d=1254746913
Chewford
11-16-2011, 08:12 PM
I believe they will an x, y, and z axis so that would make 3.
Fish Tank Frenzy
11-16-2011, 08:24 PM
Thanks dood!
Bobbob1313
11-16-2011, 10:56 PM
Home runs gon be scarce.
Home runs gon be scarce.
That means less booing from MH
Swifty
11-16-2011, 11:01 PM
Retractable roof stadiums typically have better carry with the roof closed, right? Otherwise that place is going to play huge.
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 02:20 PM
I overlayed the ballpark dimensions over the old park and Petco (Did anyone do this yet?)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/bobbob1313/PetcoComp.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/bobbob1313/BallparkComp1.jpg
Place is freaking huge.
Ecpot
12-02-2011, 02:26 PM
Isn't the ocean breeze a big factor for Petco?
Party
12-02-2011, 02:29 PM
I overlayed the ballpark dimensions over the old park and Petco (Did anyone do this yet?)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/bobbob1313/PetcoComp.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/bobbob1313/BallparkComp1.jpg
Place is freaking huge.
August 14, 2009 (http://soflamarlins.com/showthread.php?t=466)
:mischief:mischief:mischief
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 02:29 PM
Isn't the ocean breeze a big factor for Petco?
There's all kinds of factors. I'm not sure whether there's ever been public research done into what, exactly causes it, but I'm sure the Padres have internal data.
Party
12-02-2011, 02:32 PM
Bobs, I think yours are more accurate.
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 02:37 PM
:mischief:mischief:mischief
Party
12-02-2011, 02:39 PM
Can you compare it to the 60s Astrodome, por favor?
I think that's the environment closest to the new park.
(Hot city at sea level.)
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 02:43 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/bobbob1313/Astrodome.jpg
--------------------
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/bobbob1313/Astrodome-1.jpg
This one might be slightly more accurate
Party
12-02-2011, 02:58 PM
Wow.
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 03:03 PM
Astrodome wasn't particularly large when compared to other stadiums of the day. Three Rivers, Veterans, Riverfront, Atlanta-Fulton, Arlington and some others were approximately the same size.
Party
12-02-2011, 03:08 PM
Arlington had many of the wind issues the current ballpark had when it first opened. Atlanta-Fulton was known as a launching pad because of the altitude.
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 03:14 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/bobbob1313/Astrodome2.jpg
In fairness, the Astrodome was originally quite a bit bigger. It compares quite closely to our park.
Party
12-02-2011, 03:15 PM
That's why I originally asked for 60s Astrodome!
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 03:19 PM
I didn't realize the website I was using defaulted to it's final configuration.
Party
12-02-2011, 03:33 PM
Bob's on the Tweeter:
HRs last year.
http://a.yfrog.com/img808/1654/agfpf.jpg
MiamiHomer
12-02-2011, 03:34 PM
So what you're saying is we won't have to endure the HR celebration much.
rmc523
12-02-2011, 04:59 PM
So what you're saying is we won't have to endure the HR celebration much.
At first glance it would seem that way, but those in left field had to go over the tall wall, which the new park doesn't have even though it's farther out. Depends on the trajectory of the ball, but theoretically it could mean fewer home runs.
Bobbob1313
12-02-2011, 05:01 PM
I think it's almost guaranteed to suppress HRs.
The conditions in the ballpark will also be different - not as much humidity should allow the ball to fly farther by a couple more feet
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.